Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Anyone\s+using\s+VTL\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Anyone\s+using\s+VTL\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] Anyone using VTL (score: 1): Author: juan.almeida at terra.com.br (Juan Pablo Almeida); Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 13:13:20 -0300; Hi, What do you think about VTL? Are you using VTL? what model? EMC DL710 or NetApp VTL600? What about Storagetek? Thanks in advance. Juan; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-08/msg00012.html (11,258 bytes)
2. [Veritas-bu] Anyone using VTL (score: 1): Author: liddles at amgen.com (Liddle, Stuart); Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 09:27:20 -0700; Yes, we are. We currently have about 133TB of space using the NetApp VTL600's. --Original Message-- From: veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-08/msg00013.html (12,409 bytes)
3. [Veritas-bu] Anyone using VTL (score: 1): Author: juan.almeida at terra.com.br (Juan Pablo Almeida); Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 13:47:17 -0300; Hi Liddle, Are you satisfied with this equipment? Are you using compression enabled? What performance are you obtaining? How many TB are you writing daily? Why do you choose Netapp? We are looking fo; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-08/msg00015.html (14,073 bytes)
4. [Veritas-bu] Anyone using VTL (score: 1): Author: liddles at amgen.com (Liddle, Stuart); Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 09:56:56 -0700; Juan, It's Stuart (Liddle is my last name) Yes, we are satisfied with the equipment No....not using compression (tape optimization) on the VTL, because we are doing compression when we go to physical; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-08/msg00016.html (15,028 bytes)
5. [Veritas-bu] Anyone using VTL (score: 1): Author: jimh at federaledge.com (Jim Horalek); Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:10:30 -0700; There are many VTLS on the market. And usually come at a steep price. Note you are actually purchasing disk at a premium prices with limited expandability. Adding cheap linux mediaservers with cheap; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-08/msg00017.html (12,226 bytes)
6. [Veritas-bu] Anyone using VTL (score: 1): Author: jmhoward at gmail.com (John Howard); Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 13:34:29 -0400; I agree with Jim. Inexpensive disk used along with disk staging and some tape is a much better value than buying a VTL that will emulate a robot and drives. Before you buy a VTL you really need to as; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-08/msg00018.html (13,761 bytes)
7. [Veritas-bu] Anyone using VTL (score: 1): Author: alex.gerber at sepracor.com (alex.gerber AT sepracor DOT com); Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 14:48:47 -0400; VTL are expensive, however the limits I would disagree. We have a Sepaton (70+ Tb of usable - note not RAW) and I believe the limits on the Sepaton is in Petabytes. Disk Staging is a nice concept, ho; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-08/msg00020.html (15,632 bytes)
8. [Veritas-bu] Anyone using VTL (score: 1): Author: HallC at SEC.GOV (Hall, Christian N.); Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 15:02:44 -0400; Juan, I would have to agree with John Howard on this. We looked at VTL for our backup environment but before we could see where to put it. We asked ourselves what problem(s) are we trying to solve. I; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-08/msg00021.html (14,759 bytes)
9. [Veritas-bu] Anyone using VTL (score: 1): Author: briandiven at northwesternmutual.com (briandiven AT northwesternmutual DOT com); Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 14:29:55 -0500; I guess this begs the question to the audience and the people that have put in VTL's ... what problems does a VTL solve that D2D can not? I think the list so far is: 1. Administration is easier 2. Po; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-08/msg00022.html (16,416 bytes)
10. [Veritas-bu] Anyone using VTL (score: 1): Author: pkeating at bank-banque-canada.ca (Paul Keating); Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 15:51:48 -0400; Some VTL products' de-duplication technology is eons beyond compression, with low level pattern matching, etc, etc, enabling upt to 25:1 effective "compression". VTL allows you to pool disk on a sing; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-08/msg00023.html (15,073 bytes)
11. [Veritas-bu] Anyone using VTL (score: 1): Author: dave-bu at graniteweb.com (David Rock); Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 16:57:45 -0500; * briandiven at northwesternmutual.com <briandiven at northwesternmutual.com> [2006-08-01 14:29]: The biggest one that no-one has mentioned yet is the ability to share resources between media servers; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-08/msg00024.html (12,647 bytes)
12. [Veritas-bu] Anyone using VTL (score: 1): Author: nojava at netscape.com (Jim Horalek); Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 15:23:00 -0700; Unfortunately no one has answered Juan's question. Any Data Domain, Reo, Septon, Falcon Stor users out there? Jim --Original Message-- From: veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:verit; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-08/msg00025.html (14,098 bytes)
13. [Veritas-bu] Anyone using VTL (score: 1): Author: blaine_robison at yahoo.com (Blaine Robison); Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 17:26:18 -0700 (PDT); Advantage on Data domain is very fast restores. You can also configure it with SSO. and share between media servers. So you can backup and duplicate from the same VTL on multiple media servers. Blain; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-08/msg00028.html (15,410 bytes)
14. [Veritas-bu] Anyone using VTL (score: 1): Author: briandiven at northwesternmutual.com (briandiven AT northwesternmutual DOT com); Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 06:58:57 -0500; or Diligent, STK, IBM, Copan Systems, etc. ________________________________ Unfortunately no one has answered Juan's question. Any Data Domain, Reo, Septon, Falcon Stor users out there? Jim --Origina; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-08/msg00047.html (15,479 bytes)
15. [Veritas-bu] Anyone using VTL (score: 1): Author: pkeating at bank-banque-canada.ca (Paul Keating); Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 08:25:02 -0400; But why would you have to? Just create more virtual drives on the VTL, and give each media server its own drives. Save some cash on SSO licenses, and buy more disk. ;o) Paul -- -- next part -- == La; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-08/msg00049.html (13,644 bytes)
16. [Veritas-bu] Anyone using VTL (score: 1): Author: jlightner at water.com (Jeff Lightner); Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 08:44:43 -0400; You might want to in order to do database refreshes by restoring one machines database backup to another's database. We currently do that with tape using the FORCE_MEDIA_RESTORE option in our SSO set; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-08/msg00052.html (12,935 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]