Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+v6\.1\.2\s+vs\s+6\.1\.3\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [Networker] v6.1.2 vs 6.1.3 (score: 1)
Author: Teresa Biehler <tpbsys AT RIT DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 08:16:34 -0400
Hi, We're are planning an upgrade. We currently run v6.0.3 on Tru64 v4.0f and we're planning on implementing v6.1.x on Solaris. Based on recent posts, it seems like there are a number of issues with
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-06/msg00232.html (11,149 bytes)

2. Re: [Networker] v6.1.2 vs 6.1.3 (score: 1)
Author: Vince Howard <v.howard AT WANSBECK.GOV DOT UK>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 14:09:50 +0100
Teresa, We run NetWorker 6.1.2 Build 340 on Solaris 6, we've also ran it on Solaris 7, without any problems. I should mention however that we have a very 'vanilla' NetWorker installation here, 1 7-sl
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-06/msg00237.html (12,193 bytes)

3. Re: [Networker] v6.1.2 vs 6.1.3 (score: 1)
Author: "Ciolek, Ken" <Ken.Ciolek AT AIG DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 09:15:58 -0400
Teresa We just upgraded to 6.1.3 on Solaris 8 and there have been no issues. Our environment is is very complex, we have 16 9940 tape drives and have our Networker Servers clustered using LAAM. We ha
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-06/msg00238.html (12,361 bytes)

4. Re: [Networker] v6.1.2 vs 6.1.3 (score: 1)
Author: Robert Maiello <robert.maiello AT MEDEC DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 09:29:35 -0400
We've been pretty stable on 6.1.2 with some hotfixes. That said, despite what you've read, you may be better off from a support point of view on 6.1.3. We were on 6.0.3 for quite a while also..as you
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-06/msg00241.html (12,251 bytes)

5. Re: [Networker] v6.1.2 vs 6.1.3 (score: 1)
Author: "Faidherbe, Thierry" <Thierry.Faidherbe AT HP DOT COM>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 16:08:40 +0200
I went from 6.1.2 on Solaris with Tru64 Unix Storage nodes to 6.1.3 and it's quite stable. Not too much prob. HTH, Th Kind regards - Bien cordialement - Vriendelijke groeten, Thierry FAIDHERBE HPCI -
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-06/msg00264.html (13,555 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu