Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+e4500\s+Max\s+I\/O\s+capacity\s+issue\s+as\s+Legato\s+Storage\s+No\s+de\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+e4500\s+Max\s+I\/O\s+capacity\s+issue\s+as\s+Legato\s+Storage\s+No\s+de\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Networker] e4500 Max I/O capacity issue as Legato Storage No de (score: 1): Author: Bob Schuknecht <Bob_Schuknecht AT HILTON DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 15:34:37 -0600; I'm curious, how much data do you think will be directed toward this storage node and how many different clients? This is one hoss of a storage node! Are the 9940Bs Fibre ready or is there a router i; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-04/msg00081.html (13,405 bytes)
2. Re: [Networker] e4500 Max I/O capacity issue as Legato Storage No de (score: 1): Author: "Reed, Ted G II [CC]" <ted.reed AT MAIL.SPRINT DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 15:49:51 -0600; Hmmm. Matched pair of e4500s (as described below) standard e450 for firewall servers (doesn't really matter in design) v880 Master instance (little/no client data movement - ONLY the brain and fast c; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-04/msg00082.html (14,587 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]