Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Why\s+large\s+incrementals\s+on\s+MS\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [Networker] Why large incrementals on MS? (score: 1)
Author: George Sinclair <George.Sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:03:36 -0400
Hi, We've been noticing that a specific MS NT machine is backing up a large quantity of data during incrementals -- much more than we would expect. The other thing we've noticed is that the size of t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2004-06/msg00325.html (13,800 bytes)

2. Re: [Networker] Why large incrementals on MS? (score: 1)
Author: Ty Young <Phillip_Young AT I2 DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:05:25 -0500
Hey George. Yeah, sounds like you're being hit by the archive bit thing. If you set a system environment variable on such a win32 machine NSR_AVOID_ARCHIVE to a non-zero value (i.e. "1" or "true") yo
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2004-06/msg00326.html (15,496 bytes)

3. Re: [Networker] Why large incrementals on MS? (score: 1)
Author: Dave Mussulman <mussulma AT CS.UIUC DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:23:33 -0500
Search the list; this has been brought up multiple times before. I don't remember the reasoning behind it, but only a full backup resets the archive bit. Otherwise, an incremental backup will backup
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2004-06/msg00332.html (12,574 bytes)

4. Re: [Networker] Why large incrementals on MS? (score: 1)
Author: "Rohrich, James" <James.Rohrich AT UOP DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:54:55 -0500
Some additional notes. 1. If this is a server where Exchange PST files may be stored (email personal folders from Exchange), all it takes is for a user to open up outlook and the archive bit is turne
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2004-06/msg00333.html (17,009 bytes)

5. Re: [Networker] Why large incrementals on MS? (score: 1)
Author: maiellorj AT YAHOO DOT COM
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:20:26 -0400
George, Yes, we see this when some Windows boxes get large amount of data copied to them with the archive bit set. Networker does not clear the archive bit on files like this until a full backup is r
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2004-06/msg00336.html (15,765 bytes)

6. Re: [Networker] Why large incrementals on MS? (score: 1)
Author: "David M. DesRosiers" <dave AT LL.MIT DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:50:16 -0400
On Win32 [clients], you will find that the archive bit is not reset on any file that has a "modified date" that is earlier than the "created date". (I'll not go into how this happens.) I will occasio
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2004-06/msg00337.html (13,502 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu