Author: George Sinclair <George.Sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 17:58:58 -0400
We had a problem a while back, and we never did figure out what was causing it, but our nightly incrementals on this Oracle database were always the same size as the previous full. There were some us
Author: Preston de Guise <enterprise.backup AT GMAIL DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 08:23:18 +1000
Hi George, I remember reading, when I was first learning about RMAN backups with NetWorker 5 or so years ago, that to be able to do incremental backups, Oracle requires an Incremental-level-0 style b
Author: Curtis Preston <cpreston AT GLASSHOUSE DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 03:11:21 -0400
That is correct. To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request AT listserv.temple
Author: Uwe Weber <uwe.weber AT TELEOS-WEB DOT DE>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 12:11:21 +0200
Preston de Guise schrieb: If you are backing up Oracle 10, you could ask your DBA to enable Block Change tracking. This will speed up incrementals a lot. Regards, uwe To sign off this list, send emai
Author: George Sinclair <George.Sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 10:57:01 -0400
All very interesting responses. Thanks! Yes, indeed, it could have been the fact that we were not running a level 0 that was causing this mischief, but I read somewhere that if you run a level 1 cumu
Author: Curtis Preston <cpreston AT GLASSHOUSE DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 17:19:24 -0400
AND significantly reduce the I/O load of those incrementals. -- W. Curtis Preston Author of O'Reilly's Backup & Recovery and Using SANs and NAS VP Data Protection GlassHouse Technologies --Original M