Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+VMware\s+VADP\s+FULLVM\s+vs\s+FULLVMFS\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Networker] VMware VADP FULLVM vs FULLVMFS (score: 1)
Author: "Morton, Jeffrey" <Jeffrey.Morton AT MULTIPLAN DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 11:47:25 -0400
To those that are using the NetWorker VMware VADP integration, is there any particular reason you would use FULLVMFS over an image considering you can recover files from the image as well? Is there p
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2011-07/msg00122.html (12,357 bytes)

2. Re: [Networker] VMware VADP FULLVM vs FULLVMFS (score: 1)
Author: Eugene Vilensky <evilensky AT GMAIL DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 11:01:43 -0500
FULLVMFS isn't supported on non-NTFS file systems is one good reason. To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. P
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2011-07/msg00123.html (11,792 bytes)

3. Re: [Networker] VMware VADP FULLVM vs FULLVMFS (score: 1)
Author: Chester Martin <cmartin AT SPP DOT ORG>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 11:35:35 -0500
Also if "fullvmfs" is the vadp equivalent to vcb's "allvmfs" it may not grab system state data. FULLVMFS isn't supported on non-NTFS file systems is one good reason. To sign off this list, send email
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2011-07/msg00124.html (12,877 bytes)

4. Re: [Networker] VMware VADP FULLVM vs FULLVMFS (score: 1)
Author: "Morton, Jeffrey" <Jeffrey.Morton AT MULTIPLAN DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:44:39 -0400
Yes, that was a typo on my part. I was referring to the saveset ALLVMFS. Besides the NTFS-5 file system requirement, it sounds like saveset FULLVM is superior to saveset ALLVMFS as it provides the sa
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2011-07/msg00125.html (15,143 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu