Author: Thomas Staudenmaier <thomas.staudenmaier AT IZ.BWL DOT DE>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 09:37:24 -0400
Hello list, my intention is to retire the old jukebox (LTO1 drives) and replace it with a new box with LTO3 tape drives. Until the retention period for the data on LTO1 media is expired I plan to att
Author: "Rohrich, James" <James.Rohrich AT UOP DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:44:12 -0500
The first problem you may encounter is a licensing problem. With two jukeboxes, I would think you would exceed the number of slots you are licensed on the original. Not sure whether Networker would c
Author: Davina Treiber <DavinaTreiber AT PEEVRO.CO DOT UK>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:50:07 +0100
Hello list, my intention is to retire the old jukebox (LTO1 drives) and replace it with a new box with LTO3 tape drives. Until the retention period for the data on LTO1 media is expired I plan to at
Author: Peter Viertel <Peter.Viertel AT MACQUARIE DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:40:01 +1000
We just did this when migrating from SDLT to LTO in a fairly small site.. Only a few small tricks needed... A) Two jukeboxes will need two autochanger licenses. B) if you do have more than one librar
Author: Davina Treiber <DavinaTreiber AT PEEVRO.CO DOT UK>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:44:00 +0100
The first problem you may encounter is a licensing problem. With two jukeboxes, I would think you would exceed the number of slots you are licensed on the original. Not sure whether Networker would
Author: "Krishnan, Ramamurthy" <Ramamurthy.Krishnan AT KPMG.CO DOT UK>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:49:03 +0100
We have tried reading LTO-1 with LTO-2 drives which did work. Marking all the LTO-1 tapes as Read-only AND Manual will avoid the trouble of using two jb licenses until the old library is retired. Whe
Author: "Rohrich, James" <James.Rohrich AT UOP DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 09:53:04 -0500
"Personally, I'd be taking advantage of the fact that LTO-3 drives can read LTO1 media" Guess we are overlooking the obvious, since the generation is supposed to be able to read the previous two. Thi
Author: "Rohrich, James" <James.Rohrich AT UOP DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 09:49:54 -0500
I had thought of that also. Seems he may be keeping this setup for awhile though and without multiple temp licenses, it would likely not meet his needs. Another option would be placing the one old ta
Author: Stuart Whitby <swhitby AT DATAPROTECTORS.CO DOT UK>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:14:48 +0100
Another alternative which will avoid the licensing restriction is to delete the old jukebox definition and leave a drive attached as a standalone drive. If a restore requests the tape, you can manual
In regard to: Re: [Networker] Two jukeboxes using same pools, Stuart Whitby...: Another alternative which will avoid the licensing restriction is to delete the old jukebox definition and leave a driv