Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+The\s+volid\s+on\s+tape\s+and\s+the\s+one\s+in\s+media\s+base\s+is\s+not\s+the\s+same\!\s*$/: 41 ]

Total 41 documents matching your query.

1. [Networker] The volid on tape and the one in media base is not the same! (score: 1)
Author: ramo <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 05:58:00 -0400
Netoworker 7.2 UNIX AIX 5.3 (ML4) L40 [2 devices + 2 mail slots + 20 authorized Cells] Bridge StorageTeck SN3300 The automedia management is OFF hi again...plz i wanna help...my system config is belo
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00000.html (12,995 bytes)

2. Re: [Networker] The volid on tape and the one in media base is not the same! (score: 1)
Author: Stan Horwitz <stan AT TEMPLE DOT EDU>
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 06:11:05 -0400
Netoworker 7.2 UNIX AIX 5.3 (ML4) L40 [2 devices + 2 mail slots + 20 authorized Cells] Bridge StorageTeck SN3300 The automedia management is OFF hi again...plz i wanna help...my system config is bel
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00001.html (14,250 bytes)

3. Re: [Networker] The volid on tape and the one in media base is not the same! (score: 1)
Author: Davina Treiber <Davina.Treiber AT PEEVRO.CO DOT UK>
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 11:35:46 +0100
ramo wrote: Netoworker 7.2 UNIX AIX 5.3 (ML4) L40 [2 devices + 2 mail slots + 20 authorized Cells] Bridge StorageTeck SN3300 The automedia management is OFF hi again...plz i wanna help...my system co
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00002.html (14,330 bytes)

4. [Networker] The volid on tape and the one in media base is not the same! (score: 1)
Author: ramo <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 11:27:47 -0400
Ok, that?s my case : I have one tape labelled 14 days ago, in the 15th day it becomes RECYCLE; when the NETWORKER want to use it (the Automedia management is OFF) it cant write on with the message :
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00003.html (14,610 bytes)

5. Re: [Networker] The volid on tape and the one in media base is not the same! (score: 1)
Author: NetWorker <networker AT cresend DOT com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:23:04 -0500
Most likely your device names are wrong in your jukebox config. The easiest way to test if the device name is wrong in the jukebox config: 1) Make sure both tape drives are empty. 2) Use 'nsrjb -l -n
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00004.html (16,363 bytes)

6. Re: [Networker] The volid on tape and the one in media base is not the same! (score: 1)
Author: Stan Horwitz <stan AT TEMPLE DOT EDU>
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 19:38:50 -0400
Most likely your device names are wrong in your jukebox config. The easiest way to test if the device name is wrong in the jukebox config: 1) Make sure both tape drives are empty. 2) Use 'nsrjb -l -
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00006.html (15,054 bytes)

7. Re: [Networker] The volid on tape and the one in media base is not the same! (score: 1)
Author: Peter Viertel <Peter.Viertel AT MACQUARIE DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 13:17:12 +1000
What you are seeing is an inconsistency in the media database - the core problem is that when it first tried to recycle the tape there was only a partial success of the operation - eg it deletes the
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00007.html (19,163 bytes)

8. [Networker] The volid on tape and the one in media base is not the same! (score: 1)
Author: ramo <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 04:38:33 -0400
version: NetWorker 7.2.2 Build 494 Network Edition/10 My tapes are all: IMATION Black Watch ULTRIUM (400GB/200GB) I have tested the devices with the mt command; the only difference between themes is:
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00008.html (14,869 bytes)

9. Re: [Networker] The volid on tape and the one in media base is not the same! (score: 1)
Author: Peter Viertel <Peter.Viertel AT MACQUARIE DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 19:25:21 +1000
Ah ok, there goes most of my theories... Now we're back to looking at your device config then.... Can you run: inquire -v If /dev/rmt1.1 and /dev/rmt/2.1 do point at the same drive the you should see
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00009.html (17,342 bytes)

10. [Networker] The volid on tape and the one in media base is not the same! (score: 1)
Author: ramo <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 05:53:05 -0400
hir is the result of inquire -v [email protected]:STK L40 0215|Autochanger (Jukebox) S/N: LLC74003270 [email protected]:HP Ultrium 2-SCSI |Tape, /dev/rmt1.1 [email protected]:HP Ultrium 2-SCSI |Tape, /dev/rmt2.1
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00011.html (14,688 bytes)

11. Re: [Networker] The volid on tape and the one in media base is not the same! (score: 1)
Author: Peter Viertel <Peter.Viertel AT MACQUARIE DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 21:01:50 +1000
That's not much use is it? Try /usr/sbin/cdi_inq -f {device} NOTICE This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may contain copyright material of Macquarie Group Limited or third parties. If
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00012.html (15,764 bytes)

12. [Networker] The volid on tape and the one in media base is not the same! (score: 1)
Author: ramo <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 08:18:37 -0400
cdi_inq -vf /dev/rmt1.1 CDI_GET_VERSION returns 2 cdi_open failed: cdi_info.status = CDI_PARAMETER_ERROR (d) cdi_inq -vf /dev/rmt2.1 CDI_GET_VERSION returns 2 cdi_open failed: cdi_info.status = CDI_P
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00015.html (14,893 bytes)

13. Re: [Networker] The volid on tape and the one in media base is not the same! (score: 1)
Author: Stan Horwitz <stan AT TEMPLE DOT EDU>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 11:29:58 -0400
cdi_inq -vf /dev/rmt1.1 CDI_GET_VERSION returns 2 cdi_open failed: cdi_info.status = CDI_PARAMETER_ERROR (d) cdi_inq -vf /dev/rmt2.1 CDI_GET_VERSION returns 2 cdi_open failed: cdi_info.status = CDI_
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00021.html (15,473 bytes)

14. [Networker] The volid on tape and the one in media base is not the same! (score: 1)
Author: ramo <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 15:06:06 -0400
ok stan;i have posted the result of the mt command,well i will posted them again for you : mt -f /dev/rmt1.1 status mt -f /dev/rmt21 status I have tested the devices with the mt command; the only dif
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00027.html (15,325 bytes)

15. Re: [Networker] The volid on tape and the one in media base is not the same! (score: 1)
Author: Francis Swasey <Frank.Swasey AT UVM DOT EDU>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 16:03:34 -0400
Ramo, That is not what you were asked to do. Please provide the entire output from the two mt -f <device> status commands. Frank mt -f /dev/rmt1.1 status mt -f /dev/rmt21 status I have tested the dev
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00029.html (16,651 bytes)

16. [Networker] The volid on tape and the one in media base is not the same! (score: 1)
Author: ramo <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 02:57:49 -0400
mt -f /dev/rmt2.1 status rmt2 Available 0A-08-02 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive attribute value description user_settable block_size 0 BLOCK size (0=variable length) True delay 45 Set delay after a FAILED
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00035.html (17,147 bytes)

17. [Networker] The volid on tape and the one in media base is not the same! (score: 1)
Author: tkimball <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 05:06:24 -0400
Both drives have the same WWN, which is probably not helping any. You mention the drive configuration is an L40 (SCSI drives) attached to a SN3300 (SCSI to FC bridge). It sounds like the 3300 may not
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00037.html (15,304 bytes)

18. Re: [Networker] The volid on tape and the one in media base is not the same! (score: 1)
Author: Peter Viertel <Peter.Viertel AT MACQUARIE DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:13:54 +1000
Maybe they really are both pointing at the same physical device... Why don't you get a blank tape, stick it in one drive.... Write some data to it... Eg: tar cvf /dev/rmt1.1 /etc/motd Then run Tar tv
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00038.html (19,846 bytes)

19. [Networker] The volid on tape and the one in media base is not the same! (score: 1)
Author: ramo <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:00:18 -0400
Today i have a hung on RMT1.1 : nsrd: Jukebox 'STKL40' failed: label write, I/O error And an error message from my SN3300 log: PS Port Error: Type 5, S_ID 0x000000, bus 1, CDB[0] = 0x00 Device Type =
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00049.html (14,340 bytes)

20. Re: [Networker] The volid on tape and the one in media base is not the same! (score: 1)
Author: Curtis Preston <cpreston AT GLASSHOUSE DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 14:41:41 -0400
The SN3000 is a POS. STK dropped it for a reason. I haven't talked to a single customer that didn't hate it. Rip off the bandaid and move on. Curtis Preston  |  VP Data Protection   GlassHouse Techno
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00050.html (15,989 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu