Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Suspect\s+save\s+set\.\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Networker] Suspect save set. (score: 1)
Author: dusan <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:09:55 -0400
Does anyone know if there is any hope for recovering files from a save set marked as "suspect"? The saveset is on an LTO2 tape. Thanks in advance for any suggestions. +-- +-- To sign off this list, s
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2009-08/msg00212.html (11,787 bytes)

2. Re: [Networker] Suspect save set. (score: 1)
Author: Stan Horwitz <stan AT TEMPLE DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:19:00 -0400
What you hope for is entirely up to you. There's no way to tell you how likely your suspect data set can be recovered without knowing why it was marked suspect. Can you provide some details about wh
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2009-08/msg00213.html (12,050 bytes)

3. [Networker] Suspect save set. (score: 1)
Author: dusan <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:30:54 -0400
That is difficult to say. The saveset is of a drive that has always given us problems (throughput issues, i.e. 56KB/sec). We were never able to track down why. +-- +-- To sign off this list, send ema
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2009-08/msg00215.html (11,840 bytes)

4. Re: [Networker] Suspect save set. (score: 1)
Author: Stan Horwitz <stan AT TEMPLE DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:32:12 -0400
Try recovering the data to a different drive and consider replacing the suspect drive. To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type "signoff networker" in the bo
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2009-08/msg00216.html (11,940 bytes)

5. Re: [Networker] Suspect save set. (score: 1)
Author: "Browning, David" <DBrown AT LSUHSC DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:38:46 -0500
There's certainly hope. Post Katrina, we had used one of our backup tapes to restore so many times (it was users' shares), it one day got marked "suspect". We immediately marked it normal, and then c
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2009-08/msg00217.html (13,263 bytes)

6. [Networker] Suspect save set. (score: 1)
Author: dusan <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:41:57 -0400
restore to a different hard drive or use a different tape drive? i've tried the different tape drive with the same results, pretty sure restoring to a different hard disk would not make much differen
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2009-08/msg00218.html (12,115 bytes)

7. Re: [Networker] Suspect save set. (score: 1)
Author: Preston de Guise <enterprise.backup AT GMAIL DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:27:38 +1000
restore to a different hard drive or use a different tape drive? i've tried the different tape drive with the same results, pretty sure restoring to a different hard disk would not make much differen
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2009-08/msg00220.html (13,188 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu