Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+SL500\s+and\s+Alphastor\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+SL500\s+and\s+Alphastor\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Networker] SL500 and Alphastor (score: 1): Author: Jon Fraley <jfraley AT glenraven DOT com>; Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 09:07:56 -0400; Networker 7.3.3 Alphastor 3.1.1 We are doing a complete upgrade of our backup infrastructure. One of the new components is a StorageTek SL500. We have since found out the SL500 is not in the support; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-10/msg00091.html (11,409 bytes)
2. [Networker] SL500 and Alphastor (score: 1): Author: tkimball <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 05:02:29 -0400; We don't use one with AlphaStor, but connect to a 7+ year old L700 instead. Most of your concerns are in-line with mine though. I just looked at the SL500 site, and it does not mention ACSLS (which w; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-10/msg00167.html (12,570 bytes)
3. Re: [Networker] SL500 and Alphastor (score: 1): Author: Jon Fraley <jfraley AT GLENRAVEN DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:21:47 -0400; We decided not to go forward with Alphastor. Now, after the upgrade it seems that Alphastor may have been a little bit of overkill in our environment. We are now just handling the import/exporting wi; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-10/msg00225.html (13,971 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]