Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Retention\s+policy\s+on\s+clone\s+pool\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Retention\s+policy\s+on\s+clone\s+pool\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [Networker] Retention policy on clone pool (score: 1): Author: Thierry FAIDHERBE <thierry.faidherbe AT FOREM DOT BE>; Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 09:40:17 +0100; Hello, Running NSR7.4 on Windows, I discovered a strangeness I cannot explain my-self yet : I always believed that setting up a different retention policy to a pool will protect volume from being ove; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2009-12/msg00037.html (13,591 bytes)
2. Re: [Networker] Retention policy on clone pool (score: 1): Author: Frank Swasey <Frank.Swasey AT UVM DOT EDU>; Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 05:51:33 -0500; Effective results: In Backup pools, all NOT CLONED backups to have retention set as 5 Weeks, all CLONED backups to have retention set as 10 Weeks, In Clone pool, cloned copies set to 10 Weeks. Am I; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2009-12/msg00038.html (13,124 bytes)
3. Re: [Networker] Retention policy on clone pool (score: 1): Author: Thierry FAIDHERBE <thierry.faidherbe AT FOREM DOT BE>; Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 12:16:25 +0100; Thanks for the info. I am still at 7.4 and realy afraid of upgrading .... bugs of 743/744, multi 745 releases, 75/751 ... now 76 ... where to go ? Cheers Th Kind regards - Bien cordialement - Vriende; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2009-12/msg00039.html (13,998 bytes)
4. Re: [Networker] Retention policy on clone pool (score: 1): Author: Francis Swasey <Frank.Swasey AT UVM DOT EDU>; Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 06:42:04 -0500; My plan at present is (if we decide to stay with NetWorker) to skip the 7.5 release and go straight to 7.6. However, because EMC does overlapping development, there are always bugs in the new version; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2009-12/msg00040.html (15,319 bytes)
5. Re: [Networker] Retention policy on clone pool (score: 1): Author: Francis Swasey <Frank.Swasey AT UVM DOT EDU>; Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 06:44:20 -0500; Oh... you should also know that the fix you need is: LGTsc24106: Volretent for the backup volume has been changed to the ssretent of the save set on the volume that is extended after cloning, resulti; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2009-12/msg00041.html (16,218 bytes)
6. Re: [Networker] Retention policy on clone pool (score: 1): Author: Thierry FAIDHERBE <thierry.faidherbe AT FOREM DOT BE>; Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 12:56:17 +0100; Super, thanks !!! TH Oh... you should also know that the fix you need is: LGTsc24106: Volretent for the backup volume has been changed to the ssretent of the save set on the volume that is extended a; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2009-12/msg00042.html (17,565 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]