Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Question\s+about\s+NetWorker\s+7\.2\.1\s+Windows\s+encryption\s+feature\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Question\s+about\s+NetWorker\s+7\.2\.1\s+Windows\s+encryption\s+feature\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Networker] Question about NetWorker 7.2.1 Windows encryption feature (score: 1): Author: Stan Horwitz <stan AT TEMPLE DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 16:19:32 -0500; I am testing the NetWorker Windows encryption feature on a laptop client with Windows XP Pro and NetWorker 7.2.1 as the client. Our NetWorker server is running Solaris 9 and NetWorker 7.2.1. The docu; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2006-03/msg00078.html (12,746 bytes)
2. Re: [Networker] Question about NetWorker 7.2.1 Windows encryption feature (score: 1): Author: Siobhan Ellis <Siobhan.Ellis AT ENSTOR DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 13:53:04 +1100; Stan, I wouldn't even bother with pre 7.3 for encryption. It's pathetic. 7.3 brings in 256 bit encryption. Siobhán Ellis Principal Technology Consultant ENSTOR Pty Ltd Level 10, 118 Alfred St Milsons; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2006-03/msg00080.html (13,744 bytes)
3. Re: [Networker] Question about NetWorker 7.2.1 Windows encryption feature (score: 1): Author: Stan Horwitz <stan AT TEMPLE DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 22:18:48 -0500; Stan, I wouldn't even bother with pre 7.3 for encryption. It's pathetic. 7.3 brings in 256 bit encryption. Thanks, but management has to come into compliance with some government regulations and we'; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2006-03/msg00081.html (12,293 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]