Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Persistent\s+Bindings\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Persistent\s+Bindings\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Networker] Persistent Bindings? (score: 1): Author: Marc Levitan <marc.levitan AT PFPC DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 08:18:57 -0400; I have 4 storage nodes using Dynamic Drive Sharing. Everything was working properly for a while. The storage nodes directly accessed the tape drives across the SAN. Now, everything is NOT working. Wh; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-05/msg00376.html (11,951 bytes)
2. Re: [Networker] Persistent Bindings? (score: 1): Author: Marc Levitan <marc.levitan AT PFPC DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 08:35:11 -0400; The bridges are Pathlight SAN Gateways. I have 2 Gateways. Each one controls 3 IBM Ultrium LTO drives in an Adic Scalar 100 Library. Lars Johansson <lars.johansson@ To: "'marc.levitan AT PFPC DOT COM; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-05/msg00377.html (13,275 bytes)
3. Re: [Networker] Persistent Bindings? (score: 1): Author: Marc Levitan <marc.levitan AT PFPC DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 08:39:11 -0400; The bridges are Pathlight SAN Gateways. I have 2 Gateways. Each one controls 3 IBM Ultrium LTO drives in an Adic Scalar 100 Library. The HBAs are Emulex LP8000. lpfc 4.11c Gregory Demilde - System To; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-05/msg00378.html (13,761 bytes)
4. Re: [Networker] Persistent Bindings? (score: 1): Author: Davina Treiber <treiber AT HOTPOP DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 09:05:47 -0400; On Mon, 19 May 2003 08:18:57 -0400, Marc Levitan <marc.levitan AT PFPC DOT COM> wrote: Persistent binding is absolutely the right solution here. All SAN implementions for tape devices should always u; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-05/msg00380.html (12,687 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]