Author: MIchael Leone <Michael.Leone AT PHA.PHILA DOT GOV>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:02:50 -0400
I have an odd problem. I have a MS SQL cluster resource that seems to be grabbing a regular client license, instead of a license for a SQL Module, and I don't understand why. 12116:nsrlic: License Su
Author: "Goslin, Paul" <pgoslin AT CINCOM DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 14:02:38 -0400
This makes perfect sense to me.... One std client license is needed to backup the client itself (filesystem). And One MS-SQL license is needed to backup the SQL databases. = 2 licenses used - one for
Author: MIchael Leone <Michael.Leone AT PHA.PHILA DOT GOV>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 14:22:02 -0400
EMC NetWorker discussion <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU> wrote on 06/15/2010 02:02:38 PM: The weird thing? Only one of those cluster resources is taking up a regular client license - the other
Author: wallace88 <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:35:42 -0400
Starting with, i think, 7.4.2, if both the NetWorker server and clients are the same version or higher, then it does not use cluster licenses anymore. Instead it uses only client connected licenses.
Author: "Terveen, Frank" <Frank.Terveen AT AFM DOT NL>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 05:58:06 +0200
Yes Wallace I have seen the same use of licenses with our sql, exchange and fileserver cluster. met vriendelijke groeten / With kind regards Frank Terveen -- Sent via BB -- Oorspronkelijk bericht --
Author: MIchael Leone <Michael.Leone AT PHA.PHILA DOT GOV>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 08:35:37 -0400
EMC NetWorker discussion <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU> wrote on 06/15/2010 08:35:42 PM: In my case, all my SQL clusters are also storage nodes (AFTD devices), and since all storage nodes mus