Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Legato\s+Networker\s+vs\s+Backup\s+Exec\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Legato\s+Networker\s+vs\s+Backup\s+Exec\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Networker] Legato Networker vs Backup Exec (score: 1): Author: Felix Pablo Grande <fpgrande AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 06:06:59 +0100; Hi, any thing about Legato Networker vs Backup Exec ? Reasons for use Networker ? Regards, -- Félix Pablo Grande Ramos Software is like sex: it's better when it's free. Linus Torvalds "Esta es tu últ; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2007-11/msg00384.html (11,669 bytes)
2. Re: [Networker] Legato Networker vs Backup Exec (score: 1): Author: Siobhán Ellis <siobhanellis AT HOTMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:00:58 +1100; One is an entrprise backup solution. One isn't. You aren't even comparing kinds of apples to apples, more like an apple to a grape. What functionality are you looking for? That's why you use a produc; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2007-11/msg00386.html (11,666 bytes)
3. Re: [Networker] Legato Networker vs Backup Exec (score: 1): Author: Scott McDermott <scottm AT KCLS DOT ORG>; Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:35:16 -0800; It's been a while since I converted from Backup Exec to Networker, but at that time the issue was that it did not scale. It could not perform multiple backups simultaneously or effectively use multip; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2007-11/msg00394.html (13,178 bytes)
4. [Networker] Legato Networker vs Backup Exec (score: 1): Author: Felix Pablo Grande <fpgrande AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 22:25:38 +0200; Hi, has any body a comparative between Legato Networker and Backup Exec ? In our company we are using Legato Networker but someone want to change to Backup Exec. Regards, Felix To sign off this list,; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2006-08/msg00149.html (11,595 bytes)
5. Re: [Networker] Legato Networker vs Backup Exec (score: 1): Author: Shyam Hegde <hegde.shyam AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 02:15:41 +0530; It also depends on what you backup - how many backup clients, what OS platforms, any application level backups, NDMP, DDS etc. etc. and the scalability of your environment you backup also matters...; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2006-08/msg00150.html (13,141 bytes)
6. Re: [Networker] Legato Networker vs Backup Exec (score: 1): Author: David Mingia <dmingia AT GUILFORD DOT EDU>; Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:52:07 -0400; I used BU Exec for 5 years and changed to Networker last November. I don't know the cost differences but from an operational side I have opinions. First Exec give you more real-time information on wh; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2006-08/msg00151.html (15,792 bytes)
7. Re: [Networker] Legato Networker vs Backup Exec (score: 1): Author: "McKnight, Scott (USPC.PRG.Atlanta)" <Scott_McKnight AT PRINCETONRG DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 00:02:57 -0400; I've used both. From experience, I can tell you that Legato is harder to set up. However, it is far more flexible for heterogeneous environments, is more powerful, and can scale much easier. BackupEx; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2006-08/msg00153.html (14,933 bytes)
8. Re: [Networker] Legato Networker vs Backup Exec (score: 1): Author: Anuj Mediratta <anuj AT ace-data DOT com>; Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:34:41 +0530; Hi, Networker 7.3.x would give you better GUI & reporting tools while operating as well as backup status & stats reports. Regards, Anuj Mediratta Phone: +9312634262 --Original Message-- From: Legato; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2006-08/msg00154.html (16,853 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]