Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+LTO\s+speed\s+is\s+slow\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+LTO\s+speed\s+is\s+slow\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Networker] LTO speed is slow (score: 1): Author: Mark Davis <rikk0088 AT YAHOO DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 15:25:01 -0400; Can't get my HP Ultrium drive to backup any faster then 1.2MB-sec. I've update the firmware and drivers for the drive and SCSI controller (39160). I'm backing up multiple streams from the local serve; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-05/msg00426.html (11,871 bytes)
2. Re: [Networker] LTO speed is slow (score: 1): Author: "Day, David" <david.day AT CENTERPULSE DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 14:46:28 -0500; Have you tried any native backups to compare speed? I use the same drives on a Solaris system and get slower than expected results but still 8-18gb/s. My drives are HVDS and so are a bit slower than; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-05/msg00427.html (13,484 bytes)
3. Re: [Networker] LTO speed is slow (score: 1): Author: "Neild, Jim" <Jim.Neild AT SSHA.ON DOT CA>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 15:54:25 -0400; When backing up local files (use BIGASM) determine the max throughput of the drive when it is set to Target Sessions 1 and paralellism is set to 1 for the client. What is the speed? Can't get my HP U; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-05/msg00428.html (12,663 bytes)
4. Re: [Networker] LTO speed is slow (score: 1): Author: Dave Smith <rikk0088 AT YAHOO DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 13:17:19 -0700; I also saw the tech note that indicated stepping down the 29160 from 160 to 80 may help, it didn't. I haven't tried NTBACKUP, never used it before. Does it show the device speed? I've had the drive t; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-05/msg00429.html (14,628 bytes)
5. Re: [Networker] LTO speed is slow (score: 1): Author: "Thomas, Calvin" <calvin.thomas AT NACALOGISTICS DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 13:53:18 -0700; In the NT tuning guide it talks about the block size of your scsi adapter. It says that a XXXX type of tape drive does 1.8MB/sec at 32K block size and 15MB/sec at 256K block size ( I don't remember t; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-05/msg00430.html (12,976 bytes)
6. Re: [Networker] LTO speed is slow (score: 1): Author: Dave Smith <rikk0088 AT YAHOO DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 06:45:45 -0700; If I change the block size won't that prevent me from reading from the tapes I've already written to? "Thomas, Calvin" <calvin.thomas AT NACALOGISTICS DOT COM> wrote: In the NT tuning guide it talks; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-05/msg00452.html (13,680 bytes)
7. Re: [Networker] LTO speed is slow (score: 1): Author: Terry Lemons <lemons_terry AT EMC DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 11:52:11 -0400; NetWorker has an internal table, which is the same on every platform, that defines the (for NetWorker) optimal block size for every device it supports. If you define the NSR_DEV_BLOCK_SIZE_MSG=YES en; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-05/msg00463.html (13,701 bytes)
8. Re: [Networker] LTO speed is slow (score: 1): Author: Davina Treiber <treiber AT HOTPOP DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 14:10:57 -0400; On Thu, 22 May 2003 06:45:45 -0700, Dave Smith <rikk0088 AT YAHOO DOT COM> wrote: tapes I've already written to? At one time I would have said that yes it would prevent it. Some recent testing makes; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-05/msg00466.html (12,057 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]