Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+How\s+are\s+groups\s+being\s+used\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+How\s+are\s+groups\s+being\s+used\s+\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Networker] How are groups being used ? (score: 1): Author: Skip Hanson <shanson AT EMC DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 19:23:42 -0700; All, Hello. I am curious how all of you are using groups in NetWorker ? Do you group backups by type: (Filesystem, Oracle, SQL etc.) or do you use other criteria ? You can respond to me using network; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2010-05/msg00134.html (11,889 bytes)
2. Re: [Networker] How are groups being used ? (score: 1): Author: "STANLEY R. HORWITZ" <stan AT TEMPLE DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 22:31:59 -0400; Skip, For the most part, I use groups to segregate different departments' servers. We have a very simple setup where every client's backup gets the same browse and retention period. I do have a coupl; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2010-05/msg00135.html (12,456 bytes)
3. Re: [Networker] How are groups being used ? (score: 1): Author: "Browning, David" <DBrown AT LSUHSC DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 22:17:43 -0500; We definitely group by backup type (Windows/SQL/Exchange). However, we also group by backup time, and/or, common traits. We separate out the huge fileservers, so that when they take 36 to 48 hours to; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2010-05/msg00136.html (13,429 bytes)
4. Re: [Networker] How are groups being used ? (score: 1): Author: "Werth, Dave" <dave.werth AT GARMIN DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 14:05:20 -0700; We basically have 4 groups, one for regular backups (weekly fulls and daily incrementals), one for Exchange backups (weekly fulls and daily incrementals) and two for what we call Month End backups th; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2010-05/msg00143.html (14,212 bytes)
5. Re: [Networker] How are groups being used ? (score: 1): Author: Stephanie Finnegan <sfinnega AT AIP DOT ORG>; Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 09:32:47 -0400; We use groups extensively (and probably not according to best practice! ;) ) for scheduling purposes. We have about 150 clients in our environment, and roughly 50 groups. Different save sets, differe; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2010-05/msg00148.html (15,684 bytes)
6. [Networker] How are groups being used ? (score: 1): Author: brerrabbit <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 10:22:23 -0400; We use groups to segregate our backup types, fulls in one set, differentials in a separate complimentary set. The schedules associated with the clients in each set (same client exists in both groups); /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2010-05/msg00151.html (13,042 bytes)
7. Re: [Networker] How are groups being used ? (score: 1): Author: Teresa Biehler <tpbsys AT RIT DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 10:29:04 -0400; We use groups to meet two requirements: - backups windows - differing retention times (group name forces pool selection) Since we've started using NMM, we've also needed to create groups specifically; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2010-05/msg00152.html (13,859 bytes)
8. [Networker] How are groups being used ? (score: 1): Author: tkimball <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 01:32:37 -0400; Our setup is mostly grouped by 'type' (pc, dev, other in-house server groups, etc), with different times for each. Over time, we've added servers to groups based on what time the group ran, since we; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2010-05/msg00162.html (13,309 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]