Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Extended\s+retention\s+time\s+on\s+EDL\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Networker] Extended retention time on EDL (score: 1)
Author: JKK <johannes.karlsson AT SKYRR DOT IS>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 21:19:50 -0400
Hi. Those of you who are writing backups to EDL: What do you do about backups that need retention times longer that 2-3 months? Are you storing backups for longer than 3 months on EDL? What are alter
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2009-09/msg00017.html (11,617 bytes)

2. Re: [Networker] Extended retention time on EDL (score: 1)
Author: Chester Martin <cmartin AT SPP DOT ORG>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 08:14:51 -0500
We don't store any data on edl longer than 2 weeks, so my browse and retention times are set to 2 weeks. But we clone to physical tapes daily. The pool that it's cloned to has the retention times set
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2009-09/msg00027.html (12,896 bytes)

3. Re: [Networker] Extended retention time on EDL (score: 1)
Author: Anacreo <anacreo AT GMAIL DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 08:59:12 -0500
I set my long retention in NW like normal 13 months or 4 weeks. All my backups land on the EDL... I run a script on Mondays to *push* all data older then 4 weeks off of the EDL onto tape. For non-NDM
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2009-09/msg00029.html (14,937 bytes)

4. Re: [Networker] Extended retention time on EDL (score: 1)
Author: Anacreo <anacreo AT GMAIL DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 14:42:41 -0500
Here is the script I'm using to find those recycleable EDL tapes... I've not had to complete the NDMP portion so ignore that dead end bit of code, 'if [ $POOL -eq "DailyEDL" ]; then', prevents the ND
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2009-09/msg00050.html (18,483 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu