Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+EMC\/Legato\s+NetWorker\s+comparison\s+to\s+Veritas\/Seagate\s+NetBackup\s+and\s+IBM\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+EMC\/Legato\s+NetWorker\s+comparison\s+to\s+Veritas\/Seagate\s+NetBackup\s+and\s+IBM\'s\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Networker] EMC/Legato NetWorker comparison to Veritas/Seagate NetBackup and IBM's (score: 1): Author: "Ballinger, John M" <john.ballinger AT PNL DOT GOV>; Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 19:17:28 -0700; Terry or anyone out there - Can you aim me to where I might find an independent(or not) comparison between the following three products: EMC/LegatoNetworker IBM Tivoli Storage Manager(TSM) Veritas Ne; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2005-09/msg00299.html (15,265 bytes)
2. Re: [Networker] EMC/Legato NetWorker comparison to Veritas/Seagate NetBackup and IBM's (score: 1): Author: Charles Weber <weberc AT COMCAST DOT NET>; Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 07:58:38 -0400; http://storagemagazine.techtarget.com/magIssue/0,291265,sid35_iss1123349,00.html has an interesting survey about backup software. registration required unfortunately as I recall, comvault did very we; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2005-09/msg00304.html (17,412 bytes)
3. Re: [Networker] EMC/Legato NetWorker comparison to Veritas/Seagate NetBackup and IBM's (score: 1): Author: "Rock, Jerry" <jrock AT STRUCT DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 08:31:11 -0400; Whatever you do...DON'T rip out your backup software. Just my opinion, but if you've been running it for a number of years, you've undoubtedly customized your configurations to your liking. If you br; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2005-09/msg00307.html (16,970 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]