Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+A\s+time\s+to\s+choose\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+A\s+time\s+to\s+choose\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Networker] A time to choose (score: 1): Author: Davina Treiber <treiber AT HOTPOP DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 11:45:13 -0400; This is something that you ought to be able to fix. It is not desirable for different jukeboxes to read barcodes in different formats. Generally, the L1 should be ignored and not passed through to th; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-07/msg00130.html (11,925 bytes)
2. [Networker] A time to choose (score: 1): Author: "Maarten Boot (CWEU-USERS/CWNL)" <maarten.boot AT NL.COMPUWARE DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:47:38 +0200; Dear Networkers, Currently we use DLT7000 drives and are looking into choosing a new generation of media. Obvious choices are LTO SDLT and AIT. The idea is to slowly start moving one of our pools. Ot; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-06/msg00477.html (12,369 bytes)
3. Re: [Networker] A time to choose (score: 1): Author: Oscar Olsson <spam1 AT QBRANCH DOT SE>; Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 13:57:43 +0200; generation Get one or two more CPUs to handle the I/O. Such CPUs can be found on ebay for less than $1000 nowdays. and Seems similar to our design as well, although we have a gigabit ethernet fiber a; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-06/msg00478.html (12,724 bytes)
4. Re: [Networker] A time to choose (score: 1): Author: Stan Sander <ssande AT SANDIA DOT GOV>; Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 09:20:13 -0600; Dear Networkers, Currently we use DLT7000 drives and are looking into choosing a new generation of media. Obvious choices are LTO SDLT and AIT. The idea is to slowly start moving one of our pools. O; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-06/msg00487.html (13,178 bytes)
5. Re: [Networker] A time to choose (score: 1): Author: "Maarten Boot (CWEU-USERS/CWNL)" <maarten.boot AT NL.COMPUWARE DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 17:33:30 +0200; Currently we have 2 EXABYTE 18D (1 tape , 8 slots) and one 230 ( 1dlt7000 and 9 slots used ) The smaller libraryes of storagetek the l20 do not seem to support the 9940 as far as I can figure out on; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-06/msg00490.html (15,037 bytes)
6. Re: [Networker] A time to choose (score: 1): Author: "Willeat, Todd" <TWilleat AT MHP.SMHS DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:52:03 -0500; LTO-1 tapes should work in LTO-2 drives. In fact, the LTO-2 drives should be able to write to the LTO-1 tape a little faster than an LOT-1 drive... Currently we have 2 EXABYTE 18D (1 tape , 8 slots); /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-06/msg00491.html (15,126 bytes)
7. Re: [Networker] A time to choose (score: 1): Author: Brendan Sandes <Brendan.Sandes AT DSE.VIC.GOV DOT AU>; Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 10:03:02 +1000; Hi Maarten. The only thing I can add, is we have a couple of SUN L20 (which are HP units) and a couple of sun L180 (which are a storage tek unit using IBM drives). The only difference, is in the way; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-06/msg00500.html (13,574 bytes)
8. Re: [Networker] A time to choose (score: 1): Author: Brendan Sandes <Brendan.Sandes AT DSE.VIC.GOV DOT AU>; Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 10:25:48 +1000; We're using LTO tapes by the way. B Brendan.Sandes AT DSE.VIC.GOV DOT AU Sent by: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU 30/06/2003 10:03 AM Please respond to NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU; Plea; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-06/msg00502.html (14,357 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]