Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[NV\-L\]\s+Mapping\s+varbind\s+2\s+for\s+TEC\s+messes\s+up\s+hostname\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[NV\-L\]\s+Mapping\s+varbind\s+2\s+for\s+TEC\s+messes\s+up\s+hostname\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [NV-L] Mapping varbind 2 for TEC messes up hostname (score: 1): Author: Jane Curry <jane.curry AT skills-1st.co DOT uk>; Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 08:00:25 +0000; NetView 7.1.5 (yes, I finally got it - thanks James!), on Solaris 10. TEC 3.9 FP3. I am forwarding a NetView TRAP that I have created (1101 in the netview6000 enterprise) to TEC. It has my own TEC cl; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2006-11/msg00024.html (11,619 bytes)
2. Re: [NV-L] Mapping varbind 2 for TEC messes up hostname (score: 1): Author: James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>; Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 08:41:38 -0500; No I have not seen it, but I don't see how it could be unique to 7.1.5 If you are using NetView's enterprise id as the enterprise in your trap, then you must conform to NetView's trap rules, which re; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2006-11/msg00025.html (14,228 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]