Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+the\s+behaviour\s+of\s+\"Rerun\s+Failed\s+Levels\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+the\s+behaviour\s+of\s+\"Rerun\s+Failed\s+Levels\"\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Bacula-users] the behaviour of "Rerun Failed Levels" (score: 1): Author: Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho AT linpro DOT no>; Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 02:25:07 +0100; [...] the Ignore FileSet Changes directive is not considered when checking for failed levels, which means that any FileSet change will trigger a rerun. I don't understand what that means... let's say; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-11/msg00285.html (12,155 bytes)
2. Re: [Bacula-users] the behaviour of "Rerun Failed Levels" (score: 1): Author: Dan Langille <dan AT langille DOT org>; Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 20:38:52 -0500; I'm not sure. Does this thread help? http://marc.info/?l=bacula-users&m=119027057407116&w=2 -- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux bas; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-11/msg00288.html (12,533 bytes)
3. Re: [Bacula-users] the behaviour of "Rerun Failed Levels" (score: 1): Author: Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho AT linpro DOT no>; Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 03:30:14 +0100; thanks, but no, it doesn't mention the interaction with IgnoreFileSetChanges -- regards, | Redpill _ Kjetil T. Homme | Linpro (_) -- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-11/msg00289.html (12,851 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]