Hello, Does bacula have any feature where, depending upon the UID of the unix user executing the bconsole program, one can choose different restrictions for the console and this would all be specifie
Thanks. I did read it. As far as I can tell, the answer is "no". It is easy to _define_ different console privilege levels, but it is hard to _select_ between them. If I wasn't clear in my original e
Author: Heitor Faria <heitor AT bacula.com DOT br>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 20:46:40 -0300 (BRT)
Hello, Peter: please check if this shell script (I named it 'baculejo') and configurations bellow suits you, given root user. cat /usr/sbin/baculejo ==>8 Cut Here >8== DIR_NAME=hfaria-K46CB-dir DIR_
Hello, I see why this works, but it tells me there is no way in bacula to perform the configuration in question without resorting to either a wrapper script, some other out of band solution, or imple
Author: Heitor Faria <heitor AT bacula.com DOT br>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 21:52:58 -0300 (BRT)
-- Original Message -- Hello, Peter. You are right in all your affirmatives. 'root' was just one example, but I though you would use less generic users for this solution. I think you can improve the
Author: Dimitri Maziuk <dmaziuk AT bmrb.wisc DOT edu>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 21:13:27 -0600
... Also, all users would have the As a side note backups vs permissions has always been a very icky issue anyway: what do you expect to happen when a non-root user tries to restore files they have n
Hello, This feature is not needed. Simply specify a different bconsol.conf (different restricted console name + password) in different directories that can only be accessed by the person you want to
Hello, Alternatively you can use Baculum and define restricted consoles self. In this case users have access to assigned restricted consoles even without having shell accounts. And they have bconsole