Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+multiple\s+volumes\s+moved\s+from\s+scratch\s+pool\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+multiple\s+volumes\s+moved\s+from\s+scratch\s+pool\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Bacula-users] multiple volumes moved from scratch pool (score: 1): Author: Dan Langille <dan AT langille DOT org>; Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:52:26 -0400; The problem persists on 5.2.6 10-Apr 09:40 bacula-dir JobId 93111: Begin pruning Jobs older than 3 years . 10-Apr 09:40 bacula-dir JobId 93111: No Jobs found to prune. 10-Apr 09:40 bacula-dir JobId 9; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2012-04/msg00127.html (15,832 bytes)
2. Re: [Bacula-users] multiple volumes moved from scratch pool (score: 1): Author: Robert Hartzell <bear AT rwhartzell DOT net>; Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:24:42 -0700; I reported this back in July of 2010 http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=25685277 This has happened to me several times since then but I haven't been able to figure out why. It is s; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2012-04/msg00139.html (14,701 bytes)
3. Re: [Bacula-users] multiple volumes moved from scratch pool (score: 1): Author: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:01:23 -0400; After years of not seeing this bug I had this happen to me two weeks ago on bacula-5.2.5. It grabbed around 10 tapes from the Scratch pool into the pool that needed a volume then prompted me that it; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2012-04/msg00140.html (12,401 bytes)
4. [Bacula-users] multiple volumes moved from scratch pool (score: 1): Author: Dan Langille <dan AT langille DOT org>; Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 21:31:26 -0400; I just saw this job move multiple volumes from the scratch pool into another pool. That seems very odd. Bacula 5.0.3 oh my.. I should upgrade. But just for the record: *mount storage=DigitalTapeLibra; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2012-03/msg00252.html (13,569 bytes)
5. Re: [Bacula-users] multiple volumes moved from scratch pool (score: 1): Author: Alan Brown <ajb2 AT mssl.ucl.ac DOT uk>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:11:00 +0000; I've been seeing it for a while - Kern mailed a couple of weeks ago to say he thinks he knows what's causing it but there's no fix yet. Were these all brand new tapes? -- This SF email is sponsosred; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2012-03/msg00254.html (12,884 bytes)
6. Re: [Bacula-users] multiple volumes moved from scratch pool (score: 1): Author: "Dan Langille" <dan AT langille DOT org>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:08:51 -0400; Thank you Mr Brown. Good to hear from you. Me? No, I rarely have those. I'm sure these are old, old tapes. But in good condition. I monitor the error rates and retire those with crap results. -- Dan; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2012-03/msg00255.html (13,469 bytes)
7. Re: [Bacula-users] multiple volumes moved from scratch pool (score: 1): Author: mark.bergman AT uphs.upenn DOT edu; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:39:03 -0400; pool. I've had that happen repeatedly, most recently as about 15 minutes ago. The sequence of events seems to be: bacula requests a tape from the Scratch pool the tape is assigned to the correct pool; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2012-03/msg00258.html (18,093 bytes)
8. Re: [Bacula-users] multiple volumes moved from scratch pool (score: 1): Author: Alan Brown <ajb2 AT mssl.ucl.ac DOT uk>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:01:00 +0000; Interesting. I was only seeing this occur on previously unused tapes which had been added to the pool with the "add" command - It's good to know it can occur on any tape. WRT removals for excess erro; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2012-03/msg00259.html (12,302 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]