Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+btape\s+fill\s+failure\s+on\s+HP\s+LTO6\/4\s+drives\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+btape\s+fill\s+failure\s+on\s+HP\s+LTO6\/4\s+drives\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Bacula-users] btape fill failure on HP LTO6/4 drives (score: 1): Author: Allan Black <Allan.Black AT btconnect DOT com>; Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 14:09:51 +0100; I am getting exactly the same symptoms, also under Solaris 11, except this time with an LTO2 drive. The drive worked perfectly under Solaris 10, though, and I only started seeing this after upgrading; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2014-05/msg00049.html (16,758 bytes)
2. Re: [Bacula-users] btape fill failure on HP LTO6/4 drives (score: 1): Author: "Roberts, Ben" <Ben.Roberts AT gsacapital DOT com>; Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 10:26:57 +0100; Hi Kern, Indeed I was seeing the same failure to backspace over EOT error in the job logs: End of Volume "GSA784L6" at 3910:8005 on device "drive-1-tapestore1" (/dev/rmt/1mbn). Write of 64512 bytes g; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2014-04/msg00000.html (13,709 bytes)
3. [Bacula-users] btape fill failure on HP LTO6/4 drives (score: 1): Author: "Roberts, Ben" <Ben.Roberts AT gsacapital DOT com>; Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 12:01:03 +0000; Hi all, While setting up a new tape library with HP LTO6 drives, btape test runs successfully, but btape fill fails with what looks like a problem handling the last block on the tape (perhaps an off-; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2014-03/msg00189.html (22,022 bytes)
4. Re: [Bacula-users] btape fill failure on HP LTO6/4 drives (score: 1): Author: Kern Sibbald <kern AT sibbald DOT com>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 09:28:12 +0100; Hello, btape uses all the same libraries as Bacula, and while the sequence of calls to the low level libraries may be different from what Bacula does, it does indicate a problem. It appears that the; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2014-03/msg00195.html (27,150 bytes)
5. Re: [Bacula-users] btape fill failure on HP LTO6/4 drives (score: 1): Author: Allan Black <Allan.Black AT btconnect DOT com>; Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 12:00:24 +0000; This is quite an old thread, but I'm reviving it because I have something significant to add - I'm pleased to report that BSR over EOT is now working after an upgrade to Solaris 11.3. I now believe i; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2017-01/msg00140.html (14,708 bytes)
6. Re: [Bacula-users] btape fill failure on HP LTO6/4 drives (score: 1): Author: Kern Sibbald <kern AT sibbald DOT com>; Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 14:03:14 +0100; Very interesting. It seems we do not run a full fill test on real tape drives very often nor do we run it on alternative systems like Solaris. Too bad Solaris did not run the full Bacula regression t; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2017-01/msg00141.html (16,715 bytes)
7. Re: [Bacula-users] btape fill failure on HP LTO6/4 drives (score: 1): Author: "Roberts, Ben" <ben.roberts AT gsacapital DOT com>; Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 22:23:51 +0000; This is very interesting to hear, I was just about to upgrade my backup boxes to 11.3 this month. I’ve been ignoring the EOT error for a long time since it has no impact on my ability to take o; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2017-01/msg00143.html (20,254 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]