Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+bacula\s+on\s+GigE\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Bacula-users] bacula on GigE (score: 1)
Author: "Richerland Medeiros" <rick.land AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 12:01:49 -0300
Hello everyone, I have a bacula server and client running in a Gigabit network, but i can't achieve a good speed for my backup. I have 1TB off data. Bacula don't works fine in GigE ? because i achiev
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-07/msg00159.html (12,589 bytes)

2. Re: [Bacula-users] bacula on GigE (score: 1)
Author: Ralf Gross <Ralf-Lists AT ralfgross DOT de>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 17:08:38 +0200
Richerland Medeiros schrieb: I get >80 MB/s with bacula. First you should test the network performance between bacula-fd and bacula-sd with some other tool (netperf, netpipe, netio...). Are you spool
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-07/msg00160.html (12,892 bytes)

3. Re: [Bacula-users] bacula on GigE (score: 1)
Author: "John Drescher" <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 11:10:27 -0400
Many of us get 30MB/s plus on a gigabit network. Its all a matter of determining what the limiting factor is and optimizing that. John -- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE N
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-07/msg00161.html (12,776 bytes)

4. Re: [Bacula-users] bacula on GigE (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Mueller <thomas AT chaschperli DOT ch>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 15:52:48 +0000 (UTC)
i get around 50MB/s without software compression. With compression it goes down to 12 (compression=gzip1). maybe check you disk speeds (something like tar real files to /dev/null and calculate speed
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-07/msg00164.html (12,957 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu