Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+bacula\-1\.36\.3\-r2\s+on\s+gentoo\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+bacula\-1\.36\.3\-r2\s+on\s+gentoo\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Bacula-users] bacula-1.36.3-r2 on gentoo (score: 1): Author: "Jean-François Leroux" <leroux.jeanfrancois AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 21:31:22 +0200; Hi, Bacula has been removed on gentoo from portage. I 'm using 1.36.3 on several machines but I can't add a new machine (since it's no longer in portage). So I decided to fetch from the source and in; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-07/msg00142.html (11,956 bytes)
2. Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-1.36.3-r2 on gentoo (score: 1): Author: labmonkey42 AT gmail DOT com; Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:51:57 -0500; No it has not. http://packages.gentoo.org/package/app-backup/bacula?full_cat If events were to ever transpire that bacula should be removed from portage you could always maintain your own ebuild in a; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-07/msg00143.html (13,258 bytes)
3. Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-1.36.3-r2 on gentoo (score: 1): Author: "John Drescher" <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 21:41:51 -0400; It is no longer in portage because that version is so old and has several known bugs that it should not be considered a stable version to use anymore. You can grab the ebuild off a machine that has t; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-07/msg00144.html (12,199 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]