Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Write\s+ordering\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Write\s+ordering\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Bacula-users] Write ordering? (score: 1): Author: Richard Scobie <richard AT sauce.co DOT nz>; Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:04:59 +1300; I am just testing bacula prior to deployment and restored 7 files from one directory from a backup of 3TB. This backup is stored on 3 LTO4 volumes and in order to restore these 7 files, it read from; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2010-02/msg00295.html (11,592 bytes)
2. Re: [Bacula-users] Write ordering? (score: 1): Author: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:20:30 -0500; There is no deliberate policy of spreading data across multiple tapes. It is more a function of FS order and concurrent jobs. John -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such a; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2010-02/msg00296.html (11,822 bytes)
3. Re: [Bacula-users] Write ordering? (score: 1): Author: Phil Stracchino <alaric AT metrocast DOT net>; Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:12:07 -0500; If that's a backup of a single host, that sounds ... bizarre. The only explanation I can think of is that there's a directory tree sitting in somewhere between those seven files in the directory, tha; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2010-02/msg00302.html (12,319 bytes)
4. Re: [Bacula-users] Write ordering? (score: 1): Author: Richard Scobie <richard AT sauce.co DOT nz>; Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:53:35 +1300; My initial post was inaccurate. I restored a single directory which contained 5 files: 4 x 67kB, 1 x 1.9GB - no directories. The report states that that 7 files were expected and 7 restored, so I gue; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2010-02/msg00303.html (11,811 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]