Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+VirtualFull\s+using\s+tape\s+drives\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+VirtualFull\s+using\s+tape\s+drives\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Bacula-users] VirtualFull using tape drives (score: 1): Author: Jesper Krogh <jesper AT krogh DOT cc>; Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 20:31:44 +0100; Hi Anyone doing VirtualFull backups using tapedrives only? Can they shortly describe their setup? pro/con/etc? Thanks. -- Jesper -- Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows cu; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-01/msg00127.html (12,035 bytes)
2. Re: [Bacula-users] VirtualFull using tape drives (score: 1): Author: "James Harper" <james.harper AT bendigoit.com DOT au>; Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 09:00:26 +1100; I'm not, but can tell you it's probably not a good idea - you'd end up with extra wear and tear on your tape drives, as well as greatly reduced performance while the target tape drive waited for dat; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-01/msg00137.html (12,830 bytes)
3. Re: [Bacula-users] VirtualFull using tape drives (score: 1): Author: Jim Barber <jim.barber AT ddihealth DOT com>; Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 11:15:32 +0800; Anyone doing VirtualFull backups using tapedrives only? Can they shortly describe their setup? pro/con/etc? Thanks. Yes I am. I am using a TL2000 tape library with two drives. The technique can't wor; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-01/msg00140.html (21,186 bytes)
4. Re: [Bacula-users] VirtualFull using tape drives (score: 1): Author: penne296 AT sapo DOT pt; Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 00:02:08 +0000; Citando Jim Barber <jim.barber AT ddihealth DOT com>: i raised this issue in the devel list a few month ago but nobody seemed interested in solving this problem. the subject of my message was: bug ?; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-01/msg00186.html (14,619 bytes)
5. Re: [Bacula-users] VirtualFull using tape drives (score: 1): Author: Jim Barber <jim.barber AT ddihealth DOT com>; Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 10:51:33 +0800; I'd imagine that the same technique should still work with disk based pools. I haven't tried as we don't have the disk space to do so. I don't think there is a restriction on reading and writing to t; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-01/msg00187.html (13,209 bytes)
6. Re: [Bacula-users] VirtualFull using tape drives (score: 1): Author: Blake Dunlap <ikiris AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 00:31:49 -0600; I am using a TL2000 tape library with two drives. The technique can't work if you only have one tape drive. I'm taking incremental backups Mon-Fri. Then after the incremental backups are finished on; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-01/msg00188.html (14,198 bytes)
7. Re: [Bacula-users] VirtualFull using tape drives (score: 1): Author: Jesper Krogh <jesper AT krogh DOT cc>; Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 20:03:55 +0100; A quick count shows that my current Incremental-Pool holds around 350TB worth of data, both in terms of cost, infrastructure and handling tapes are way better at that scale. If I could cut significan; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-01/msg00199.html (13,208 bytes)
8. Re: [Bacula-users] VirtualFull using tape drives (score: 1): Author: Dan Langille <dan AT langille DOT org>; Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 19:02:51 -0500; There are many things to do. Everything must be assigned a priority. When there is more work than people, what else can be done? The development team is always looking for more contributions. Until t; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-01/msg00204.html (15,145 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]