Author: Craig Van Tassle <cvantassle AT purdue DOT edu>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 11:20:12 -0400
Try apt-get install bacula-common-pgsql bacula-sd-pgsql bacula-director-pgsql That will allow you to install Bacula with Posgres support built in. I've been using Bacula on 10.10 for a couple of mont
Dear bacul-ors and bacula-rettes, I submit to you an updated Ubuntu 10.10 install script which works for me on a 64 bit machine. Bacula 5.0.3 on Ubuntu 10.10 server - Jun 2011 *NOTE: The following in
Author: Konstantin Khomoutov <flatworm AT users.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 01:34:14 +0400
[...] What's wrong with `aptitude install bacula`? In case you desperately need 5.0.3 over 5.0.2 from meerkat, what's wrong with backporting a 5.0.3 package from a more recent OS release? -- All of t
I did not know that existed. But there are a couple of things wrong with apt-get install bacula. The choices are confusing and the hit and miss approach leaves a broken install. apt-get install selec
Author: Venkatesh K Reddy <venkatesh AT kaevee DOT com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 07:39:38 +0530
I did not know that existed. But there are a couple of things wrong with apt-get install bacula. The choices are confusing and the hit and miss approach leaves a broken install. apt-get install selec
I like postgres and that's what I kept selecting. Is the apt-get or aptitude convenience that people like or is there an aversion to compiling? It is easy and you have so many configure options to se