Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Tape\s+utilization\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Tape\s+utilization\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Bacula-users] Tape utilization (score: 1): Author: Walter den Besten <w.denbesten AT nimbuzz DOT com>; Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:27:27 +0100; Happy new year, to start with.. Took some time to get back to the tape problems, is not the only one we are having :( (enough to do here..) But, checked cables, inserted the scsi controller card in a; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-01/msg00228.html (14,189 bytes)
2. Re: [Bacula-users] Tape utilization (score: 1): Author: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:52:04 -0500; Hmm. 3 hours is interesting to me. The reason is this is the correct time to write an entire tape. Also in no way should 86GB take 3 hours. To me this sounds like the tape or the tape drive is the pr; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-01/msg00229.html (14,829 bytes)
3. Re: [Bacula-users] Tape utilization (score: 1): Author: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:02:03 -0500; Your result is correct for U160 SCSI. Ask this because my server does the following after boot [ 274.856902] target8:0:3: Beginning Domain Validation [ 274.857759] target8:0:3: asynchronous [ 274.858; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-01/msg00239.html (14,991 bytes)
4. Re: [Bacula-users] Tape utilization (score: 1): Author: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:02:19 -0500; This is normal and the expected result. This looks very much like either a bad tape or a bad tape drive or dirty heads on the drive. 9.2MB/s is way too slow and the time looks interesting. I mean th; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-01/msg00252.html (14,655 bytes)
5. [Bacula-users] Tape utilization (score: 1): Author: Walter den Besten <w.denbesten AT nimbuzz DOT com>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 22:51:51 +0100; I am currently using Debian Lenny and bacula 2.4.3-1. Before I was using I presume something like version 2.2X. On the earlier version, using a HP Ultrium 448 and LTO-2 tapes of 400GB, i was able to; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-12/msg00538.html (14,609 bytes)
6. Re: [Bacula-users] Tape utilization (score: 1): Author: "John Drescher" <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:01:10 -0500; Your configuration is fine. Well except for /dev/st0. You should not use that. Use /dev/nst0 instead. Your problem generally is either a bad SCSI driver or some bad SCSI hardware, bad tape drive or; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-12/msg00539.html (13,486 bytes)
7. Re: [Bacula-users] Tape utilization (score: 1): Author: Walter den Besten <w.denbesten AT nimbuzz DOT com>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 08:25:38 +0100; Following information is found in dmesg and /var/log/messages: dmesg info: [ 8.535574] scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA ST3160815AS 3.AD PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 [ 8.535574] ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:0c:02.0[A] -; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-12/msg00542.html (17,468 bytes)
8. Re: [Bacula-users] Tape utilization (score: 1): Author: "John Drescher" <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 02:45:47 -0500; None of that looks bad. Check the scsi cabling and also you can try the btape tests or even try to fill a tape with tar or dd. I would look into this furthur but its 2:45 in the morning here. John --; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-12/msg00543.html (16,086 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]