Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Splitting\s+a\s+job\s+into\s+two\s+parallel\s+jobs\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Bacula-users] Splitting a job into two parallel jobs (score: 1)
Author: lst_hoe02 AT kwsoft DOT de
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:14:54 +0100
Zitat von Chris Adams <cmadams AT hiwaay DOT net>: If your client filesystem is slow it does not matter if you backup to disk or tape. Parallel backups on such filesystems only help if you don't satu
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2012-11/msg00008.html (13,852 bytes)

2. [Bacula-users] Splitting a job into two parallel jobs (score: 1)
Author: Chris Adams <cmadams AT hiwaay DOT net>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:24:06 -0500
I'm trying to back up a relatively large filesystem (over 500G in use) that is running somewhat slow. With my previous backup software, I divided it up into multiple parallel backup jobs, and that wo
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2012-10/msg00299.html (13,014 bytes)

3. Re: [Bacula-users] Splitting a job into two parallel jobs (score: 1)
Author: lst_hoe02 AT kwsoft DOT de
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 23:02:30 +0100
Zitat von Chris Adams <cmadams AT hiwaay DOT net>: What about using more than one snapshot? If done right snapshots are cheap, so you should have no problem to take a snapshot/mount per job to get tw
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2012-10/msg00300.html (13,980 bytes)

4. Re: [Bacula-users] Splitting a job into two parallel jobs (score: 1)
Author: Chris Adams <cmadams AT hiwaay DOT net>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 18:25:18 -0500
I'll have to check the space (not sure it is available right now). I do know that my old backup software did run the same backup (with parallel trees) somewhat faster (and that was to tape rather tha
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2012-10/msg00304.html (13,225 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu