Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Setting\s+Priority\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Setting\s+Priority\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Bacula-users] Setting Priority (score: 1): Author: Mike Hobbs <mhobbs AT mtl.mit DOT edu>; Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 15:23:47 -0400; Hello, I was wondering if someone could help me out with an issue. I've been testing Bacula 5.0.3 and Vchanger for a few months now, everything is working good and I hope to put this into production; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-07/msg00103.html (13,608 bytes)
2. Re: [Bacula-users] Setting Priority (score: 1): Author: Ben Walton <bwalton AT artsci.utoronto DOT ca>; Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 20:07:22 -0400; Excerpts from Mike Hobbs's message of Fri Jul 08 15:23:47 -0400 2011: Hi Mike, I don't think it works like this. Depending on the number of concurrent jobs you can run, the level 0's will queue up be; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-07/msg00120.html (14,758 bytes)
3. Re: [Bacula-users] Setting Priority (score: 1): Author: Martin Simmons <martin AT lispworks DOT com>; Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:24:38 +0100; Don't try to make different jobs for full and daily/differential -- it won't work. Differential backups are based on the previous full backup of the same name, so the only useful way to run them is; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-07/msg00128.html (12,311 bytes)
4. Re: [Bacula-users] Setting Priority (score: 1): Author: Ben Walton <bwalton AT artsci.utoronto DOT ca>; Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 09:55:43 -0400; Hi Martin, Thanks for correcting this. Apologies for the misinformation. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 -- All of the data; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-07/msg00131.html (12,674 bytes)
5. Re: [Bacula-users] Setting Priority (score: 1): Author: hymie! <hymie AT lactose.homelinux DOT net>; Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:29:14 -0400; I personally found the built-in Priority system to be unsuitable for my needs. I am instead using the (undocumented) feature that backups are typically executed in the order that they are placed into; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-07/msg00132.html (14,126 bytes)
6. Re: [Bacula-users] Setting Priority (score: 1): Author: Mike Hobbs <mhobbs AT mtl.mit DOT edu>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 16:04:51 -0400; Maybe I didn't word my email correctly. Let me try to explain again. Currently all my machines (about 50 of them) are set to fire off their Full backups the first of the month. I also have bacula con; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-07/msg00207.html (12,774 bytes)
7. Re: [Bacula-users] Setting Priority (score: 1): Author: Phil Stracchino <alaric AT metrocast DOT net>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:48:38 -0400; The statement of the requirement makes grammatical sense, but what you're describing doesn't entirely. Until that new Full completes, you cannot run incrementals against it, and any incrementals that; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-07/msg00209.html (13,934 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]