Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Relabel\s+steps\s+due\s+to\s+block\s+size\s+change\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Relabel\s+steps\s+due\s+to\s+block\s+size\s+change\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Bacula-users] Relabel steps due to block size change (score: 1): Author: "Clark, Patricia A." <clarkpa AT ornl DOT gov>; Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 13:46:10 -0400; There was a thread in January of 2012 discussing how to get tapes that are already labeled with a block size that is too small, usually the default 64K, to be relabeled in order to be the new block s; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2012-06/msg00070.html (12,806 bytes)
2. Re: [Bacula-users] Relabel steps due to block size change (score: 1): Author: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 13:54:26 -0400; On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Clark, Patricia A. <clarkpa AT ornl DOT gov> wrote: you can do a fast erase with: mt -f /dev/nst0 rewind mt -f /dev/nst0 weof Make sure you get the drive right and you; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2012-06/msg00071.html (12,210 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]