Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Question\s+about\s+purged\s+volumes\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Question\s+about\s+purged\s+volumes\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Bacula-users] Question about purged volumes. (score: 1): Author: "Erik P. Olsen" <epodata AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2014 14:27:30 +0200; I use backup to disk volumes only. It looks like the purging of volumes is treated as if they were tape volumes. I see no reason to keep purged volumes resident and pruned ones for that matter. Why n; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2014-08/msg00009.html (11,430 bytes)
2. Re: [Bacula-users] Question about purged volumes. (score: 1): Author: Radosaw Korzeniewski <radoslaw AT korzeniewski DOT net>; Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 09:34:07 +0200; Hello, 2014-08-02 14:27 GMT+02:00 Erik P. Olsen <epodata AT gmail DOT com>: I use backup to disk volumes only. It looks like the purging of volumes is treated as if they were tape volumes. I see no r; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2014-08/msg00076.html (12,157 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]