Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Performance\s+problem\s+with\s+baculas\s+encryption\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Performance\s+problem\s+with\s+baculas\s+encryption\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Bacula-users] Performance problem with baculas encryption (score: 1): Author: "Chad Netzer" <chad.netzer AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 17:17:38 -0700; This is in response to the following post, although I've only just subscribed: http://marc.info/?l=bacula-users&m=121409425617977 Looking at the sources (src/filed/filed.c), it appears that enabling; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-07/msg00457.html (13,698 bytes)
2. Re: [Bacula-users] Performance problem with baculas encryption (score: 1): Author: Landon Fuller <landonf AT bikemonkey DOT org>; Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:11:55 -0700; Looking at the sources (src/filed/filed.c), it appears that enabling PKI Encryption forces PKI Signing on as well. You can have signing without encryption, but not the other way around. Ah. The sign; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-07/msg00620.html (13,845 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]