Author: Uwe Schuerkamp <uwe.schuerkamp AT nionex DOT net>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 09:06:27 +0100
Hello Stephane, not for the moment I'm afraid 8( I've had to jump through all sorts of burning hoops in order to get copy jobs to work the way I want them to and even now I'm still getting weird beha
Author: Uwe Schuerkamp <uwe.schuerkamp AT nionex DOT net>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 14:53:02 +0200
Hi folks, this is my 2nd attempt to configure bacula 5.2.6 to run more than one copy job at a time, and for the life of me I cannot find the error in my config. Parallel backup jobs (both full and in
Author: Uwe Schuerkamp <uwe.schuerkamp AT nionex DOT net>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:48:19 +0200
Hi folks, while we're at it, I was wondering what's happening when bacula copies an on-disk (software-compressed) job to tape? Will it decompress the data or will it simply transfer the copy to tape
Author: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 09:59:53 -0400
Don't disk volumes have just about the same restrictions as a tape volume? Meaning you can not load more than 1 disk volume into the same device at a time. You also can not read or write to different
Author: Uwe Schuerkamp <uwe.schuerkamp AT nionex DOT net>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 16:11:37 +0200
Hi John, first off thanks for your reply. It's it's indeed a limitation within bacula, then why do parallel backup jobs to the same disk volume work just fine? I really fail to grasp the difference h
Author: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 10:14:25 -0400
Because they append at the same position of the volume interleaving blocks from each backup job. Think of a disk device as a tape drive. John -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event