Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Open\s+Source\s+Edition\s+vs\s+Enterprise\s+Edition\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Open\s+Source\s+Edition\s+vs\s+Enterprise\s+Edition\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Bacula-users] Open Source Edition vs Enterprise Edition (score: 1): Author: Steven Hammond <shammond AT technicalchemical DOT com>; Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:51:44 +0000; We have been using the Open Source edition for about 6 months. It is working fine in our production area. I’m still reading and learning a lot about the system (it is very flexible). However, w; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2013-10/msg00025.html (14,264 bytes)
2. Re: [Bacula-users] Open Source Edition vs Enterprise Edition (score: 1): Author: Kern Sibbald <kern AT sibbald DOT com>; Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 18:37:19 +0200; Hello, I am not a sales person, and I really try to keep the Bacula Systems commercial stuff on the Bacula community list to a minimum, but since you asked ... There are lots of pros of going with Ba; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2013-10/msg00032.html (18,440 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]