Author: Mingus Dew <shon.stephens AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:01:24 -0400
Dear All, I am running Bacula Community Edition 5.2.13 on Solaris 10 x86. I am trying to understand why Bacula doesn't seem to recycle when I think it should. I have recently moved to a co
Author: Ana Emília Machado de Arruda <emiliaarruda AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:43:56 -0300
Hi Mingus, When using disk volumes with automatic volume labeling, you have to tell bacula when to stop labeling new volumes... You can do it limiting the number of volumes in the pool. Also, you can
Author: Uwe Schuerkamp <uwe.schuerkamp AT nionex DOT net>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:59:51 +0200
Hi Shon, did you remember to update your volumes after changing the pool definition? Depending on the size of your catalog, recycling can take quite a while, but still bacula should not create new vo
Author: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:21:58 -0400
I initially thought that however 1,209,600 seconds is 14 days so it looks like the volumes have been updated. John -- See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end
Author: Ana Emília Machado de Arruda <emiliaarruda AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 13:43:08 -0300
Hi Shon, The question is that bacula needs more than just the "retention period" to recycle volumes when you´re using disk volumes and automatic labeling. If you don´t have a limit of volumes in your
Author: Mingus Dew <shon.stephens AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 20:44:45 -0400
Take a look at the link I posted answering you. Regards, Ana -- See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics