Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+LTO5\s+performance\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Bacula-users] LTO5 performance (score: 1)
Author: Sergio Belkin <sebelk AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:21:30 -0300
Hi guys, I come back with something with I've found, the server where the SD resides has 2 jobs. One runs really slow, it backus mainly small files, while another one on the same machine with bigger
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2013-04/msg00100.html (13,595 bytes)

2. Re: [Bacula-users] LTO5 performance (score: 1)
Author: Carsten Jensen <tomse AT tomse DOT dk>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:37:20 +0200
On 04/12/2013 02:21 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi guys, I come back with something with I've found, the server where the SD resides has 2 jobs. One runs really slow, it backus mainly small files, while
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2013-04/msg00101.html (14,651 bytes)

3. Re: [Bacula-users] LTO5 performance (score: 1)
Author: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 08:42:30 -0400
Lots of small files on hard disks (or hard drive arrays) will not get anywhere near same throughput as few larger files. One reason is seeks. It takes time to seek to each file. Make sure you have a
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2013-04/msg00102.html (12,344 bytes)

4. [Bacula-users] LTO5 performance (score: 1)
Author: Sergio Belkin <sebelk AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:04:38 -0300
Hi folks, The performance is very poor, its around 6MB/s !!! The tape device is an IBM ULT3580-HH5 Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00   Vendor: IBM      Model: ULT3580-HH5      Rev: BBN3   Type: 
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2013-03/msg00132.html (13,756 bytes)

5. Re: [Bacula-users] LTO5 performance (score: 1)
Author: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:32:39 -0400
You need to enable spooling and to run your jobs concurrently. Also set the Maximum block size and Minimum block size. On top of that I would not have set Maximum File Size = 200GB set that to a few
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2013-03/msg00133.html (13,558 bytes)

6. Re: [Bacula-users] LTO5 performance (score: 1)
Author: Carsten Jensen <tomse AT tomse DOT dk>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 22:04:58 +0100
/Carsten -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar ___________________________
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2013-03/msg00136.html (14,170 bytes)

7. Re: [Bacula-users] LTO5 performance (score: 1)
Author: <etannehill AT godaddy DOT com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:42:09 -0700
An often overlooked piece of the puzzle is your expansion cards Many times a system may have multiple 2x or 3x slots etc, but if you use both it cuts the speed in half (one for each card) Make sure y
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2013-03/msg00137.html (15,932 bytes)

8. Re: [Bacula-users] LTO5 performance (score: 1)
Author: Sergio Belkin <sebelk AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:43:30 -0300
2013/3/14 John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>: I've added Data Spool in a job resource and the following options to Storage Device resource : Maximum Spool Size = 10gb Maximum Job Spool Size
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2013-03/msg00254.html (14,863 bytes)

9. Re: [Bacula-users] LTO5 performance (score: 1)
Author: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 15:57:28 -0400
Problem with the nic? I do not see anything that is obviously wrong. John -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free tod
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2013-03/msg00255.html (12,455 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu