Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Issue\s+with\s+recycling\s+after\s+moving\s+from\s+2\.0\s+to\s+2\.4\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [Bacula-users] Issue with recycling after moving from 2.0 to 2.4 (score: 1)
Author: Yann Cézard <yann.cezard AT univ-pau DOT fr>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:19:40 +0100
Hi list, I have recently moved to bacula 2.4.4 (2.4.3 at the start, I upgraded to 2.4.4 last week), from 2.0.3 (totally new installation : new server, new databases, the only thing that I kept from t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-02/msg00380.html (31,256 bytes)

2. Re: [Bacula-users] Issue with recycling after moving from 2.0 to 2.4 (score: 1)
Author: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:19:33 -0500
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 5:19 AM, Yann Cézard <yann.cezard AT univ-pau DOT fr> wrote: Do not use volume PoolType "Backup". Only Used, Full or Append. John -- Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), Ma
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-02/msg00393.html (17,084 bytes)

3. Re: [Bacula-users] Issue with recycling after moving from 2.0 to 2.4 (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Keane <subscription AT kkeane DOT com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:31:58 -0800
If my math is right, the 12th is the 13th day of the retention period. Since the previous job finished at 22:43, and your new job started at 22:38, the rentention period hadn't elapsed yet, by about
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-02/msg00395.html (36,417 bytes)

4. Re: [Bacula-users] Issue with recycling after moving from 2.0 to 2.4 (score: 1)
Author: Yann Cézard <yann.cezard AT univ-pau DOT fr>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:08:01 +0100
John Drescher a écrit : Hi John, I don't understand what you mean, PoolType can only be one of this : (http://www.bacula.org/en/rel-manual/Configuring_Director.html#SECTION0014150000000000000000) Poo
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-02/msg00398.html (18,474 bytes)

5. Re: [Bacula-users] Issue with recycling after moving from 2.0 to 2.4 (score: 1)
Author: Yann Cézard <yann.cezard AT univ-pau DOT fr>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:28:09 +0100
Kevin Keane a écrit : Actually, I don't agree with your maths, sorry :) The 12th was the 14th day of the retention period. 29th 22:43:13 => start of retention, day/hour 0 30th 22:43:13 => 1st day 31t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-02/msg00402.html (15,758 bytes)

6. Re: [Bacula-users] Issue with recycling after moving from 2.0 to 2.4 (score: 1)
Author: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:54:35 -0500
Forget that. Mental lapse. My mind does not work well this early in the morning. Sorry. John -- Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-02/msg00404.html (14,482 bytes)

7. Re: [Bacula-users] Issue with recycling after moving from 2.0 to 2.4 (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Keane <subscription AT kkeane DOT com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:14:16 -0800
Oops. I think you are right. What are the volume, job and file retention times? I didn't see those two values in the tables you sent earlier; maybe I missed it. The only retention time I saw was the
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-02/msg00406.html (17,272 bytes)

8. Re: [Bacula-users] Issue with recycling after moving from 2.0 to 2.4 (score: 1)
Author: Yann Cézard <yann.cezard AT univ-pau DOT fr>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:13:38 +0100
Kevin Keane a écrit : Actually, File Retention is configured 13 days for every clients. But you know what ? that's a very good point ! I explain myself : At the start of my migration, I had 2 directo
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-02/msg00413.html (16,583 bytes)

9. Re: [Bacula-users] Issue with recycling after moving from 2.0 to 2.4 (score: 1)
Author: Martin Simmons <martin AT lispworks DOT com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:19:25 GMT
The pruning algorithm changed a little in the Bacula 2.2. Bacula 2.0 prunes all volumes in the current pool, but 2.2 stops pruning as soon as it finds one that can be purged. I'm not sure if that wi
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-02/msg00423.html (13,413 bytes)

10. Re: [Bacula-users] Issue with recycling after moving from 2.0 to 2.4 (score: 1)
Author: Yann Cezard <yann.cezard AT univ-pau DOT fr>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:06:35 +0100
Yann Cézard a écrit : Hi again list, So I had a look in the Files table, searching for something linked to duration, but I didn't find anything. I run dbcheck in fixing batch mode, in the hope it wou
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-02/msg00591.html (26,362 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu