Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Full\s+backups\s+can\s+be\s+missed\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [Bacula-users] Full backups can be missed (score: 1)
Author: Steve Thompson <smt AT vgersoft DOT com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:26:31 -0400 (EDT)
All versions since 1.38, at least up to 2.2.8. I have observed that if the director is not running at the time that a full backup is scheduled, then the next backup to be performed when the director
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-07/msg00831.html (12,154 bytes)

2. Re: [Bacula-users] Full backups can be missed (score: 1)
Author: Frank Sweetser <fs AT WPI DOT EDU>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:35:10 -0400
You're almost right. It's possible to almost get into that situation, but Bacula will detect and prevent it. Whenever an incremental or differential job runs, it checks the catalogue for a matching f
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-07/msg00832.html (12,822 bytes)

3. Re: [Bacula-users] Full backups can be missed (score: 1)
Author: Steve Thompson <smt AT vgersoft DOT com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:47:55 -0400 (EDT)
Ah yes, that is what is supposed to happen, but it doesn't always work. I just noticed a situation where five jobs were scheduled to do fulls on the 12th of each month, but for whatever reason the di
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-07/msg00834.html (13,754 bytes)

4. Re: [Bacula-users] Full backups can be missed (score: 1)
Author: Alan Brown <ajb2 AT mssl.ucl.ac DOT uk>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:21:45 +0100 (BST)
This behaviour is flawed for large backups. If repeat failed levels is enabled, then if an incremental is scheduled and the full is still running the increental will turn into a full - same with the
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-07/msg00863.html (12,402 bytes)

5. Re: [Bacula-users] Full backups can be missed (score: 1)
Author: Jesper Krogh <jesper AT krogh DOT cc>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:20:04 +0200
I have hit the same problem in my environment. Allthough not a perfect solution I set the concurrency of the client fd to 1 and set the Max Wait Time to 23 hours for the jobs. This makes sure I dont
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-07/msg00871.html (12,788 bytes)

6. Re: [Bacula-users] Full backups can be missed (score: 1)
Author: Dan Langille <dan AT langille DOT org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:33:02 -0400
I also believe there is a feature that prevents multiple instances of the same job from entering the queue. I do not recall if this is now implemented. -- Dan Langille -- http://www.langille.org/ --
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-07/msg00872.html (13,413 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu