Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+From\s+1\.38\s+to\s+2\.4\s+\-\s+rebuild\s+or\s+patch\s+and\s+pray\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+From\s+1\.38\s+to\s+2\.4\s+\-\s+rebuild\s+or\s+patch\s+and\s+pray\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Bacula-users] From 1.38 to 2.4 - rebuild or patch and pray? (score: 1): Author: Ryan Novosielski <novosirj AT umdnj DOT edu>; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:32:09 -0400; I can say that the upgrade process from 1.38 to 2.0 was painless, as was the upgrade from 2.0 to 2.2. Therefore, an upgrade would probably not be so bad. Keep a backup of your working copy, obviously; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-07/msg00742.html (13,530 bytes)
2. [Bacula-users] From 1.38 to 2.4 - rebuild or patch and pray? (score: 1): Author: "Mark Walkom" <markwalkom AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:49:37 +1000; Hi All, We want to move to version 2.4 ASAP but we are tossing up whether to rebuild our backup plan with a fresh install of 2.4, or try to shoehorn the current config of 1.38 into 2.4. What are your; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-06/msg00273.html (11,413 bytes)
3. Re: [Bacula-users] From 1.38 to 2.4 - rebuild or patch and pray? (score: 1): Author: Arno Lehmann <al AT its-lehmann DOT de>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:54:52 +0200; Hi, If you want to continue with your existing catalog and volumes, or have a large number of things to configure (many different clients, filesets, storages, pools, schedules... whatever) I'd upgrad; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-06/msg00280.html (13,043 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]