Author: xunil321 <Rainer.Blaes AT astrium.eads DOT net>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 06:13:26 -0700 (PDT)
Dear all, we want to setup Bacula 5.0.3 under SLES 11 SP1 in the following way: 1x Director and three DEDICATED SD servers (each system has 6TB disk storage and one LTO-4 tape autochanger). We learnt
Author: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:26:47 -0400
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 9:13 AM, xunil321 <Rainer.Blaes AT astrium.eads DOT Yes. For the last 7 years I have had my director on a different machine than my storage machines. For most of this my datab
Author: Ben Walton <bwalton AT artsci.utoronto DOT ca>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 10:01:54 -0400
Excerpts from xunil321's message of Sat Jun 25 09:13:26 -0400 2011: Build RPMs one one system that split the whole package out into dir, fd and sd sub-packages. Then just install the RPMs where you n
Author: xunil321 <Rainer.Blaes AT astrium.eads DOT net>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 08:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
-- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Director-with-3-dedicated-storage-servers-tp31925923p31926629.html Sent from the Bacula - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- All the d
Author: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 13:45:47 -0400
You run the storage-daemon on any machine containing storage and configure the director machine to use these storages. Remember in bacula there are 3 different daemons (storage, director and client)
No. The SD mounts the remote storage. Not the Director. I think you need to read more about what each Bacula daemon does. The FD sends backups to the SD, not the Dir. It does not need access. The SD