Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Bacula\s+recycles\s+Volumes\s+instead\s+of\s+creating\s+new\s+ones\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [Bacula-users] Bacula recycles Volumes instead of creating new ones (score: 1)
Author: Marc Richter <mr AT web-factory DOT de>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 12:11:18 +0200
Hi There! This is my first mail to this list, so please be patient, if I'm missing a point. We're using Bacula for several months now. As "Backup Drive" we configured three pools. One pool for Monthl
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-10/msg00210.html (16,192 bytes)

2. Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula recycles Volumes instead of creating new ones (score: 1)
Author: Marc Richter <mr AT web-factory DOT de>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:41:25 +0200
Noone knows about ? If so, and I haven't an answer to this until Monday the 13th, I will create a Bug Report for this, since this seems to be an undocumented/defected behavior of bacula. Regards, Mar
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-10/msg00293.html (17,609 bytes)

3. Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula recycles Volumes instead of creating new ones (score: 1)
Author: Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho AT linpro DOT no>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:06:35 +0200
I believe this is intended behaviour, and it's the behaviour I want. after all, when I tell Bacula I want to keep that backup for 180 days, that's what I actually mean, and I don't want Bacula to sta
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-10/msg00295.html (12,905 bytes)

4. Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula recycles Volumes instead of creating new ones (score: 1)
Author: "John Drescher" <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:39:57 -0400
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:39 AM, John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com> wrote: -- John M. Drescher -- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the cool
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-10/msg00296.html (13,680 bytes)

5. Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula recycles Volumes instead of creating new ones (score: 1)
Author: "John Drescher" <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:43:07 -0400
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:39 AM, John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com> wrote: Sorry, I am wrong. I was thinking of a different thread where the user had volumes being recycled way before the r
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-10/msg00297.html (13,870 bytes)

6. Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula recycles Volumes instead of creating new ones (score: 1)
Author: Marc Richter <mr AT web-factory DOT de>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:02:54 +0200
Hi List! John Drescher schrieb: OK, it's correct, that Bacula can "per configuration" choose free between recycling outimed volumes or label a new one. Neither the Outtimed ones, nor the new ones sho
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-10/msg00309.html (17,300 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu