Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Bacula\s+database\s+rogue\s+tables\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Bacula\s+database\s+rogue\s+tables\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Bacula-users] Bacula database rogue tables (score: 1): Author: Kostis Fardelas <dante1234 AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 12:32:57 +0200; Hi, I noticed today on a bacula installation (Debian Jessie, 5.2.6+dfsg-9.3) the following rogue tables (bXXXXXXXXXXX): +--+ +--+ +--+ 46 rows in set (0.00 sec) For one of them: +--+--+--+--+ +--+--+; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2017-01/msg00082.html (14,355 bytes)
2. Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula database rogue tables (score: 1): Author: Marcin Haba <ganiuszka AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 14:39:27 +0100; Hello Kostis, These additional tables were created during restore with using Bvfs. They could be done by older Baculum version (>7.4). From version 7.4.0 Baculum removes current table when restore st; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2017-01/msg00083.html (17,028 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]