Author: Ivan Barrera <ibarrera AT netglobalis DOT net>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 13:32:54 -0400
Greetings: We've been using Bacula for a time now. Actually, i'm installing a new machine to replace the old one. It has 2 1.75TB volumes mounted at /backup-1 and /backup-2. I need bacule to use both
Hi, Upgrade to something newer before the setup gets more complex :-) No. That's more or less balancing by chance... To use such a setup, you need two storage devices with different names and differe
Author: Ivan Barrera <ibarrera AT netglobalis DOT net>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 15:10:36 -0400
I'll sure do :) Yep , it is more complex than what i want. That's not really a big problem. Both 1.75TB volumes, are iscsi targets, from a HP-Sma unit (12x750GB disks, Raid 5). Initially we disliked
Hi, No, I don't see any real problems there. Personally, I'm using XFS for my larger file systems, but that's more or less only a matter of taste today (IMO). For a new system, I would use ext3 and p
Author: David Ballester <ballester.david AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 10:44:03 +0200
El mar, 08-04-2008 a las 00:32 +0200, Arno Lehmann escribió: IMMO, in this type of case you can add inexpensive 1G ethernet devices and use bonding to 'disperse' network traffic across devices. Of co