Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Bacula\s+and\s+Suse\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Bacula\s+and\s+Suse\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and Suse (score: 1): Author: "Cody Grosskopf" <cgrossko AT wusd DOT org>; Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 07:47:20 -0700; Maybe try SLES 10 SP3? Or SLES 11? >>> Sak Mon 10/27/09 1:56 AM >>> Hi everybody: We have a Suse Enterprise Server 10 SP 2 (SLES10SP2) that include glibc 2.4 (glibc-2.4-31.54). I see that bacula 2.4; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-11/msg00010.html (11,707 bytes)
2. [Bacula-users] Bacula and Suse (score: 1): Author: Sak Mon <netamego AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:49:52 +0100; Hi everybody: We have a Suse Enterprise Server 10 SP 2 (SLES10SP2) that include glibc 2.4 (glibc-2.4-31.54). I see that bacula 2.4 requiere glibc 2.5 and bacula 3.0.2 requiere glibc 2.6. Is there a w; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-10/msg00516.html (11,536 bytes)
3. Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and Suse (score: 1): Author: Evan Fraser <Evan.Fraser AT rms DOT com>; Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:23:49 +0000; Hello Sak, I run bacula 3.0.3 on Suse Enterprise 10 SP2. I had to edit the RPM spec file a little bit to be able to compile it though, and attached it to this email. This spec file should work fine w; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-10/msg00517.html (13,258 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]