Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Bacula\s+and\s+High\s+availability\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Bacula-users] Bacula and High availability (score: 1)
Author: Egoitz Aurrekoetxea <egoitz AT ramattack DOT net>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 12:12:21 +0200
Good morning, Have been thinking in how could be setup a bacula infrastructure with HA. You could for example if you use Postgres or Mysql the databases replicate the servers through its own replicat
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2014-05/msg00030.html (12,306 bytes)

2. Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and High availability (score: 1)
Author: Dan Langille <dan AT langille DOT org>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 18:48:23 -0400
On May 7, 2014, at 6:12 AM, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea <egoitz AT ramattack DOT net> wrote: For any jobs that have finished, and for all replication which has completed, you have everything. But thats not w
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2014-05/msg00058.html (14,115 bytes)

3. Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and High availability (score: 1)
Author: Egoitz Aurrekoetxea <egoitz AT ramattack DOT net>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 12:03:49 +0200
Good morning Dan!, El 10/05/2014, a las 00:48, Dan Langille <dan AT langille DOT org> escribió: Really: does your requirement really need HA of this level? Would it not be sufficient to accept that i
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2014-05/msg00072.html (12,862 bytes)

4. Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and High availability (score: 1)
Author: Josh Fisher <jfisher AT pvct DOT com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 09:28:48 -0400
The database must be HA. I believe even Postgres 9 binary streaming replication is not atomic. The local write and replicated write must be a single atomic operation. Therefore something like DRBD's
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2014-05/msg00090.html (14,406 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu