Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Bacula\s+MySQL\s+Agressive\s+Tuning\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Bacula-users] Bacula MySQL Agressive Tuning (score: 1)
Author: Heitor Faria <heitor AT bacula.com DOT br>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 12:24:00 -0300 (BRT)
Mr. Bacula Users, What do you think of those MySQL tuning hints for Bacula, specifically about this innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit option? => http://www.innovation-brigade.com/index.php?module=Conten
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2014-12/msg00175.html (18,251 bytes)

2. Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula MySQL Agressive Tuning (score: 1)
Author: D S <info AT alink DOT biz>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 18:17:54 +0200
Hello, just to add one more related question/problem to this thread: - using MySQL/MyISAM - about 15M files from several clients - 2.5-3M files per client - the problem: the Dir inserting Attributes
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2014-12/msg00176.html (15,177 bytes)

3. Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula MySQL Agressive Tuning (score: 1)
Author: Phil Stracchino <phils AT caerllewys DOT net>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 13:59:23 -0500
Truth is, innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit = 2 should be the default option. innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit = 1 is going to be slow whenever there is a very high rate of small commits, because every co
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2014-12/msg00177.html (13,415 bytes)

4. Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula MySQL Agressive Tuning (score: 1)
Author: Heitor Faria <heitor AT bacula.com DOT br>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 21:20:31 -0300 (BRT)
Thanks Phil! That was very enlightening. I think for Bacula type of workload is a very important MySQL setting to change. Do you have any information if for Postgresql using the synchronous_commit =
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2014-12/msg00178.html (13,778 bytes)

5. Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula MySQL Agressive Tuning (score: 1)
Author: Josh Fisher <jfisher AT pvct DOT com>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 11:01:17 -0500
On 12/21/2014 11:17 AM, D S wrote: Hello, just to add one more related question/problem to this thread: - using MySQL/MyISAM - about 15M files from several clients - 2.5-3M files per client - the pro
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2014-12/msg00180.html (18,465 bytes)

6. Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula MySQL Agressive Tuning (score: 1)
Author: Phil Stracchino <phils AT caerllewys DOT net>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 11:20:31 -0500
It is probably more accurate to say that MyISAM is a poor choice, period. It is a legacy storage engine that, honestly, should no longer be used in production. Even in a 100% read scenario, the best
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2014-12/msg00181.html (12,989 bytes)

7. Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula MySQL Agressive Tuning (score: 1)
Author: Oschwald Robert <robertoschwald AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 18:08:54 +0100
For us, even InnoDB was way to slow. It took hours to insert attributes. We switched to PostgreSQL three years ago. Since then, no more performance problems. Also, creating the tree for restores was
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2014-12/msg00182.html (14,793 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu